Callum
Callum

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I must thank Winsome Callum of the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) for her response (‘Don’t mislead the public, Mr Montague’,Gleaner, April 9, 2013) to my calls for her company to share in the sacrifices the whole nation is being called to undertake. The call was made on March 6, 2013 for her company to reduce electricity rates by 10-12 percentage points.

Two recommendations were then made.

1) For JPS to use the recommended Office of Utilities Regulation rates, as contained in the current request for proposal (RFP), for alternative energy solutions. JPS is suggesting a rate of US$0.2672 per kilowatt-hour. If you add the US$0.11 per kilowatt-hour, for transmission and distribution, you would get US$0.3772 per kilowatt-hour. JPS charges approximately, US$0.40 per kilowatt-hour.

A decrease in its rates to match the OUR rates would be welcomed by all JPS customers.

2) The Government was also asked to reduce the so-called guaranteed 17.5 per cent profits. The writer claims there are no such guaranteed profits.

Therefore, could JPS consider publishing the terms and conditions of the licence?

Would the JPS also consider engaging the OUR and see how best it could bring the rates in harmony? Noting that alternative energy solutions are more expensive?

I am well aware that JPS is one of our best corporate and compassionate citizens and will take into account the feeling of merciless exploitation, that many of its customers feel when we get our monthly bills.

I am also heartened by the openness of the company for dialogue and anxiously await an invitation so to do.

In the meantime, all of Jamaica would be so happy if the JPS announce a cut in its rates.

JPS, we are depending on you to help in whatever way you can to advance Jamaica.

ROBERT MONTAGUE

Chairman, JLP

Read more:

The Office of Utilities Regulations (OUR) has pushed back the date for providing a recommendation to the government on the supply of 360 megawatts of power to the national grid.

The OUR says it decided to move the deadline from March 31 to April 15 after it received more proposals than expected.

According to the OUR, it has received proposals from five entities which will require more time for it to carry out its analysis.

The OUR says it has engaged the services of an independent consultant to assist in evaluating the proposals.

The 360 megawatts project is part of efforts by the government to bring down the cost of electricity.

The project was originally awarded to the Jamaica Public Service Company but the request for proposal process was reopened after the light and power entity failed to satisfy all the requirements of the bid.

Read more:

Mr. Paulwell said…

October 16, 2005
says he hopes to introduce net metering in Jamaica by the end of next month
“I’ve instructed the OUR (Office of Utilities Regulation) to finalise a
policy framework for net metering,” Sunday Observer.

– to date, no net metering

August 19, 2011
Amended and Restated All-Island Electric License 2011
Electricity Power Wheeling
Net Billing
October 19, 2012 Paulwell Blames JPS For Power-Wheeling Delay

– to date, no wheeling

February 12, 2012
has announced plans to set up a bipartisan energy council tasked with
achieving up to 62 per cent reduction in energy costs paid by households and
businesses – in 3 years

– to date, no reduction, no plans, no announcements

May 01, 2012
Net Billing
pilot programme limited to 2 years commencing no later than May 01, 2012 and
capped at an aggregate capacity of 2% of JPS

Arthur Hall, Senior News Editor

An American firm hoping to spend US$700 million (J$65 billion) to set up waste-to-energy plants in Jamaica could walk away from the project.

Green Waste Energy says while it has not yet given up on Jamaica, it is becoming frustrated.

President of Green Waste Energy, James D Burchetta, says the infrastructure in Jamaica does not encourage investment in renewable energy, especially from waste.

Green Waste Energy had proposed to spend the billions of dollars to construct four processing plants across the island to transform the waste from the island’s dumps into electricity.

This would be in keeping with the efforts by the Government to have 115-megawatts of renewable energy added to the national grid by 2015.

The four plants would create approximately 1,700 full-time jobs and 1,000 jobs during construction pumping millions of dollars in the economy.

Last week, Burchetta expressed concern about the process to get the approval to construct the plants and the absence of a tipping fee for trucks taking waste to the major landfills.

“We applaud the Government’s efforts to reduce electric rates and help the environment with renewable energy,” Burchetta told

Small generators of renewable based electricity are being assured that they can still use the Jamaica Public Service Standard Offer Contract procedure to apply to sell electricity to the Jamaica Public Service (JPS).

This reassurance comes from the Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR), which published a notice two days ago, announcing the suspension of the non-competitive process for the generation of renewable based electricity.

OUR

A JPS technician at work. - File
A JPS technician at work. – File

The Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) last Wednesday slashed in half the period in which power provider Jamaica Public Service Company Limited (JPS) can back-bill customers.

Under the JPS Revised Back Billing Policy, the company can now back-bill for two billing periods, equivalent to two months, down from four periods. But there are instances in which the utility will also be able to collect for electricity usage extending back six years.

The two-month measure mainly allows JPS to rectify incorrect or under billing or to collect in instances where bills were not generated due to internal system faults.

Importantly back-billing for meter tampering and fraud remains at six years, while corrections to overbilling arising from a JPS error or omission also remain at six years.

“This is not to be described as a victory for anyone because it is the means by which the regulator is bringing balance and fair play to a system which had been out of step with international norms,” said Michael Bryce, director of consumer & public affairs at the OUR.

“In terms of cost, it is not about how much it will cost but about how much can be recovered. This cannot be quantified until each case is completed and judged according to merit,” he said.

Revised policy

The revised policy is supposed to align with best practices in the United States and United Kingdom, and protect both JPS and its customers.

Queries to JPS on the impact of the revision on its operations went unanswered up to press time. The power company‘s annual revenues now tops US$1.15 billion or J$99.9 billion.

Last year, the OUR directed JPS to revise its back-billing policy and procedures in accordance with recommendations contained in the reportInvestigation of the JPS Billing and Metering System for Electricity Consumption.

The independent investigator and former OUR director general, J. Paul Morgan, concluded that JPS’s back-billing policies did not accord with “best practices” and did not sufficiently protect the rights of customers.

“Under the revised policy, there is now a reduction in the maximum period – from four to two – for which an account can be back-billed in several instances,” said the OUR in a release explaining the measure.

JPS is now required to issue the Revised Back Billing Policy as a Code of Practice and make it publicly available in accordance with Condition 16 of the Amended and Restated All-Island Electric Licence of 2011.

Unauthorised benefit

Last year, JPS recorded US$105 million (J$9b) in unbilled revenue, which represents estimates of the heat rate, system losses rate, fuel rate and Independent Power Provider or IPP charges, other non fuel rates and unbilled quantity. Unbilled revenues rose 19 per cent above 2010 levels.

“In cases where the account is not registered in the JPS Customer Information System or the meter is not included in the JPS meter database – dummy meter – and therefore was never billed, and the non-registration in either case is not due to an error or failure by JPS, the account shall be back-billed or adjusted for the period for which the customer/user received the unauthorised benefit but not exceeding six years. In such a case, the customer shall have the responsibility of providing the evidence of the date of installation of the dummy meter, if a period of less than six years is to be applied in the circumstances,” said the OUR in its determination notice dated May 2012 but released last week.

“Where an account has been overbilled or subject to excess charges, because of an error or omission by JPS, or a condition of the meter or service installation infrastructure, JPS shall adjust or back-bill, as appropriate, the account for a period not exceeding six years or for the exact period for the overbilling occurred, whichever is less.”

business@gleanerjm.com

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120610/business/business1.html

 

JAMAICA Public Service Company (JPS) has applied for a rate adjustment that could result in a 0.42 per cent increase in light bills.

In its submission to the Office of Utilities Regulations (OUR), the light and power company suggested that it increase its non-fuel rates by an average of 2.09 per cent.

It also asked for an adjustment to the heat rate target that would result in a 1.55 per cent reduction in the fuel rate.

Given that the fuel component of the typical residential customer