Dr Carlton Davis, head of the LNG steering committee.Ian Allen / Photographer
Dr Carlton Davis, head of the LNG steering committee.Ian Allen / Photographer

Lower energy prices up in the air!

The Government‘s long-announced plan to introduce liquefied natural gas (LNG) as one measure to reduce electricity rates remains in limbo with no clear indication, when, or if, this will take place.

The proposed 2014 timeline will not be met and the man leading the process, Dr Carlton Davis, is not committing himself to a new timeline.

“We will soon know the full truth,” Davis told a recent Gleaner Editors’ Forum as he noted that the State is now ready to start negotiations with Samsung, which has been selected to construct the LNG infrastructure locally.

“We have just about completed the process of looking at the price quotations of the liquefied gas and within another couple of weeks we will determine whether the whole thing makes senses and if it makes sense how fast we move on it,” said Davis.

Under the original plan supported by successive administrations, LNG would be added to the country’s fuel mix, replacing oil to sharply reduce the country’s energy bill while lowering the price of electricity to consumers.

The plan was made on the assumption that the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) would construct a new 360 megawatts power plant in Old Harbour Bay, St Catherine, by 2014.

The JPS has indicated that the plant should be up and running by 2014, but recent concerns from potential financial partners have left a cloud around that project.

The company is also yet to say if it will proceed with the building of the new plant if the Government fails to deliver LNG.

price discussion

Last Thursday, the Government’s technical team reviewed the proposals for the supply of the gas and this week, the LNG steering committee will meet to discuss the price of the gas before making a recommendation to the Cabinet.

“We have the quotations for the infrastructure, we have the quotations for the price of the LNG … there are financial security issues … all these put together will give us a pretty good idea of where we are, then we will meet (and make a decision),” Davis told the Editors’ Forum.

“Issues as to whether we are going to abandon that path wholly or partially will be determined. The real question is whether the JPS will find the price that (the LNG) comes out to at a sufficient comfort level … to give the public a price of electricity that is much lower than they currently pay,” added Davis.

If LNG can be sourced at an acceptable price, the JPS could reduce the fuel cost to its customers by approximately 40 per cent.

According to Davis, “Circumstances will dictate where we go from here. As I said, in just a matter of days we will know what sort of game is on, if a game is on in a certain direction.”

However, despite the price concerns which could derail the project, Davis did not comment on the Government’s decision to select Samsung as its preferred bidder to do the LNG infrastructure when its offer was higher than the bid entered by EXMAR.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120819/lead/lead3.html

The former head of the Government‘s liquefied natural gas (LNG) steering committee Chris Zacca, is downplaying the impact of the extended delay in the introduction of this product to the country’s fuel mix.

Zacca, who now heads the Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica, told a recent Gleaner Editors’ Forum that criticisms about the State’s slow movement on this critical matter are unfounded.

“I have made the point consistently that if you had all the LNG in the world today, you would have to burn it in your stoves at home because there is nowhere to burn it, so you have to combine your schedule to their (the Jamaica Public Service Company’s) schedule to build a new power plant,” said Zacca.

Without that generating plant there is no project, so the delays are not an issue,” added Zacca.

For years the price of LNG was a fraction of the price of oil, but with increased demand for natural gas in recent years the price has started to increase, with a recent Morgan Stanley research document showing the price at December 2011 more than double what it was in December 2010.

LNG was priced at approximately 50 per cent of oil in 2010.

“Our problem with fuel in this country has resulted … from us trying to make the best be the enemy of good. If we had moved 10, 12 years ago to a new fuel solution, whatever it may have been, even though it might not have been perfect at the time by, now we would have been way ahead of the game,” said Zacca.

According to Zacca, “LNG is not going to come in, no matter what way you do it, at a fraction of the cost of oil. I think, if we are lucky, we can get it 20 per cent below the current price (of oil).”

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120819/lead/lead6.html

THE EDITOR, Sir:

As a lifetime student of economics, I hasten to agree with Dr Carlton Davis that the size of the market for the consumption of electricity is too small for competition, and if there is going to be a second supplier, that supplier would have to satisfy the authorities of the viability of more than one supplier. What I think the public needs is the authorities to provide proper safeguards against injustice being meted out to it by any supplier.

I do not, however, agree that Dr Davis, as adviser to the Government, should have made his opinion public, while the relevant minister seems to think that competition is a perfect fit in this case, and perhaps in every case, and seems to forget all decisions must be in the best interest of the people.

In this case, it cannot be in the best interest of the people if because of competition, rivals become bankrupt and the people have no electricity.

Energy Minister Phillip Paulwell, we need some critical thinking here, for which you are well known. Mind you, I think you have always been a great minister, but you are wrong this time, because to err is human and so, you deserve forgiveness.

OWEN S. CROSBIE

oss@cwjamaica.com

Mandeville, Manchester

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120818/letters/letters9.html

 

There is never uncertainty when Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce rockets from the blocks in a 100-metre dash. Usain Bolt and Yohan Blake may get off a bit behind the competition, but they accelerate with such command that the prize is usually theirs.

The same, unfortunately, cannot be said for how the Jamaican Government manages the country’s affairs, exemplified this week by the confusion over energy policy.

Energy Minister Phillip Paulwell had long since declared his Government’s intention to break the monopoly in transmission and distribution (T&D) of electricity. That seemed to be settled policy. On Tuesday, Mr Paulwell was contradicted by Dr Carlton Davis, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller. He favours a “regulated monopoly” and suggests that Mr Paulwell’s pronouncements were, for the Government, not conclusive.

Then, Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller tiptoed between the raindrops. The upshot continued, if not deepened, uncertainty.

PROHIBITIVE COST

The policy tug of war might have been considered just another bit of Jamaican political theatre, but the fact is that the issue at hand is of great importance and urgency. There is clear consensus that, bad economic management apart, the high cost of electricity is the greatest constraint to the competitiveness of Jamaican firms and to growth in output.

Jamaicans pay upwards of US$0.40 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity, higher than the rate in most of its regional economic competitors. Policymakers have talked much, over many years, about strategies to reduce the cost of energy. They have achieved little.

Recently, though, we appeared to have been getting somewhere, with a plan to shift from expensive oil to cheaper fuels to generate power. The idea is to start with natural gas, although coal remains in the mix.

Several months ago, the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS), the light and power provider, and its owners won a bid to establish a 360-megawatt power plant that is to be fired by natural gas. The Government is also about to rule on bids for a liquefied natural gas storage and regasification facility.

The projection is that using cheaper natural gas to fire this power plant, combined with its greater efficiency, will lead to a reduction in the cost of electricity of between 30 per cent and 40 per cent.

Paulwell’S AMBITIOuS TARGETS

At the same time, Mr Paulwell has been loudly promoting the break-up of the JPS’s monopoly on the grid, arguing that this could deliver the 60 per cent drop in the price of power that he has set as his benchmark.

The minister’s critics, however, argue that the energy minister’s focus on the power company’s T&D monopoly has introduced uncertainty into its operations – exacerbated by a recent court ruling against the exclusivity of the JPS’s operating licence – especially with the company being in the market for capital to finance the gas-fired plant.

The attention, critics feel, should be on fuel choice. Dr Davis agrees. He believes that Jamaica’s electricity market, with peak demand for under 700 megawatts, is too small for a competitive free-for-all.

The statement from the prime minister’s office acknowledges the market uncertainty engendered by the liberalisation debate and the need for continuity “in the short run”. But it makes no policy commitment.

We wonder what would have been the result of Jamaica’s record run in the men’s 4x100m relay at the Olympics if there was such uncertainty in the team.

The opinions on this page, except for the above, do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. To respond to a Gleaner editorial, email us: editor@gleanerjm.com or fax: 922-6223. Responses should be no longer than 400 words. Not all responses will be published.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120817/cleisure/cleisure1.html


Energy Minister Phillip Paulwell (left) is seen here with JPS chairman Hisatsugu Hirai in January 2012 at a reception hosted by Hirai. - File
Energy Minister Phillip Paulwell (left) is seen here with JPS chairman Hisatsugu Hirai in January 2012 at a reception hosted by Hirai. – File

Power provider, Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS), disclosed depressed quarterly profit of half-billion dollars on Wednesday but avoided accounting for the pending loss of its monopoly status amid court appeals and talks with the Government over securing its exclusive licence.

JPS made net profit of US$5.8 million (J$528m) at second quarter June 2012, down 41 per cent compared to year-earlier levels.

The company’s reduced profit resulted from a 44 per cent spike in finance costs to US$12.6 million compared with a year earlier.

Directors Hisatsugu Hirai and Fitzroy Vidal said in a joint note that it was too early to quantify the impact of the Supreme Court decision that set aside JPS’s monopoly but did not invalidate the licence.

“The outcome of this court decision, which the company intends to appeal, cannot be determined with certainty at this time and no provision has been made in the financial statements regarding this matter,” stated the directors on behalf of the board.

Hirai is chairman of the power utility.

Earlier this week, JPS president and CEO Kelly Tomblin said the company could see its US$450 million of long-term loans placed in default if it loses the legal appeal to keep its all-inclusive licence and if the Jamaican Government refuses to amend the language in the agreement.

But it also means that the financing of the near US$620-million planned natural gas power plant is virtually on hold pending the appeal. JPS’ loans were premised on its distribution monopoly arising from its licence, which runs to year 2027.

For the half year, JPS made net profit of US$7 million, or one-third the HY2011 results of US$21 million, despite an uptick in revenue to US$581 million.

Last month’s Supreme Court ruling invalidating JPS’ monopoly on distribution of electricity was a victory for claimants Dennis Meadows, Betty Ann Blaine and Cyrus Rousseau who challenged the exclusive 20-year licence granted by the then minister of mining and energy to the JPS in 2001.

Electricity charges in Jamaica remains one of the highest in the region due to its reliance on expensive oil, which has tripled in price since 2000.

JPS’ fuel bill topped US$407 million at half year, rising by more than 10 per cent year-over-year, but was flat at US$201 million in the second quarter.

business@gleanerjm.com

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120817/business/business2.html

The Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) is reporting success in its efforts to reduce electricity theft in St. Catherine which is one of the parishes with a high rate of theft.

The JPS says in July, it executed 10 operations in which 1,037 illegal connections were removed.

The JPS also says its teams discovered 61 cases of meter irregularities, including the use of meter bypasses and other devices.

According to the company, arising out of these operations, 17 persons were charged with illegal abstraction of electricity.

The JPS has committed US$30 million this year to the fight against electricity theft.

editorial@gleanerjm.com

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/latest/article.php?id=39307