The Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) has given the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) until March 15 to submit the details of an alternative proposal for supplying 360 megawatts of power to the national grid.

Earlier this month, the OUR had announced it had ended the request for proposal process with the JPS for the 360 megawatts power plant.

A day after missing the January 30 deadline to provide final details of how it would undertake the project, the JPS had made an alternative proposal to the OUR.

But in a release last night the OUR said the company

The Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) has given the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) until March 15 to submit the details of an alternative proposal for supplying 360 megawatts of power to the national grid.

Earlier this month, the OUR had announced it had ended the request for proposal process with the JPS for the 360 megawatts power plant.

A day after missing the January 30 deadline to provide final details of how it would undertake the project, the JPS had made an alternative proposal to the OUR.

But in a release last night the OUR said the company

Robert Pickersgill (centre), Minister with responsibility for Water, Land, Environment, and Climate Change, presses the button to officially inaugurate the West Kingston Power Plant. The state-of-the-art technology installed at the Industrial Terrace location is more efficient at converting fuel to energy, which should reduce the amount of energy lost to heat. In light of the current thrust in the industry towards LNG, the power station, which has been designed to run on heavy fuel oil, has the capacity to run on gas after minimum conversion efforts.

Robert Pickersgill (centre), Minister with responsibility for Water, Land, Environment, and Climate Change, presses the button to officially inaugurate the West Kingston Power Plant. The state-of-the-art technology installed at the Industrial Terrace location is more efficient at converting fuel to energy, which should reduce the amount of energy lost to heat. In light of the current thrust in the industry towards LNG, the power station, which has been designed to run on heavy fuel oil, has the capacity to run on gas after minimum conversion efforts.

Read more:

Jamaica is hoping to establish a floating LNG barge like this one found on the website of the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, posted courtesy of www.lngoneworld.com.
Jamaica is hoping to establish a floating LNG barge like this one found on the website of the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, posted courtesy of www.lngoneworld.com.

A plunge in the price of natural gas has made it cheaper for utilities to produce electricity. But the savings aren’t translating to lower rates for customers. Instead, United States electricity prices are going up.

Electricity prices are forecast to rise slightly this summer. But any increase is noteworthy because natural gas, which is used to produce nearly a third of the country’s power, is 43 per cent cheaper than a year ago. A long-term downward trend in power prices could be starting to reverse, analysts say.

“It’s caused us to scratch our heads,” says Tyler Hodge, an analyst at the Energy Department who studies electricity prices.

The recent heat wave that gripped much of the country increased demand for power as families cranked up their air conditioners. And that may boost some June utility bills. But the nationwide rise in electricity prices is attributable to other factors, analysts say:

In many states, retail electricity rates are set by regulators every few years. As a result, lower power costs haven’t yet made their way to customers.

Utilities often lock in their costs for natural gas and other fuels years in advance. That helps protect customers when fuel prices spike, but it prevents customers from reaping the benefits of a price drop.

The cost of actually delivering electricity, which accounts for 40 per cent of a customer’s bill on average, has been rising fast. That has eaten up any potential savings from the production of electricity.

Utilities are building transmission lines, installing new equipment and fixing up power plants after what analysts say has been years of underinvestment.

This may reverse what has been a gradual decline in retail electricity prices. Adjusted for inflation, the average retail electricity price has been drifting mostly lower since 1984, when it was 16.7 cents per kilowatt-hour.

“The ratepayer is going to have to foot the bill,” says David Wright, vice-chairman of the South Carolina Public Service Commission and president of the National Association of Regulatory Commissioners.

PRICE INCREASE EXPECTED

The average US residential electricity price is expected to be 12.4 cents per kilowatt hour for the June-to-August period, up 2.4 per cent from the same time last year. For the full year, electricity prices are expected to rise two per cent.

In a typical summer month, that would mean an extra $3 on a residential bill, which includes the cost of generating the power and delivering it to a home, plus local taxes and fees.

Electricity pricing is complicated, and it differs from state to state. In states where power providers are allowed to compete, such as Texas, Pennsylvania and New York, customers can shop around for cheaper electricity, although delivery charges are still set by regulators.

Natural gas has plummeted in price because of a dramatic increase in US gas production over the past few years and a warm winter that allowed supplies to build up.

Even though coal accounts for 38 per cent of all power produced in the US, natural gas plays an outsized role in determining the price of electricity.

The price paid for electricity from the last power plant fired up to meet demand at any given moment is what sets the wholesale price for a given region. And since gas-fired power plants are usually the most expensive, they tend to be fired up last.

– AP

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120712/business/business1.html

On April 12 I wrote a column titled, ‘Is JPS likely to give us the full hundred’. In response, JPS head of Corporate Communications Winsome Callum had a piece published as a letter to the editor on April 15 titled, ‘Inaccurate Mr Wignall, here are the facts’.

Space will not allow me to respond to every sentence and paragraph of the JPS letter, but I will deal with the points which appear to be the most important, plus other salient matters that were not fully highlighted in the crosstalk.

The JPS plant at Old Harbour in St Catherine.

 

As a target JPS is easy to beat up on simply because it is a monopoly. Almost every household in Jamaica has no other option but to purchase its expensive power and there doesn’t seem to be any sanctions in place if the company operates inefficiently.

One part of the JPS letter said, “Any balanced analysis of JPS’ operations will need to take into consideration the company’s continued investments in its operations. Each year, JPS spends an average of US$50 million to ensure that our power plants are operating as efficiently as possible, to improve system reliability, and to tackle the monster of electricity theft in order to create a more equitable playing field for our customers”.

It seems to me that outside of an independent audit of JPS, the entity most capable of providing a balanced analysis of JPS is JPS itself, but I would never expect JPS to make such an analysis public. The Corporate Communications arm of a large company like JPS is in the business of churning out treacle for public consumption. It is simply PR on steroids.

The first question is, what exactly has JPS done to increase the efficiency of its units, most of which are 30 years old and have reached their useable limit? Spending money on power plant efficiency and system reliability seems to me to be throwing good money after bad as, short of changing out these units, each spend is patent waste.

The company stated in its letter, “In the last five years, JPS invested US$280 million in operational improvements, while on the other hand recording US$115 million in cumulative profit.”

Great for JPS, the contractors involved and the workers, but where in all of this did the customers, the lifeblood of JPS, get a benefit? Where was the rate reduction?

The letter also said, “Mr Wignall’s article also incorrectly states that JPS does not suffer a penalty for inefficient operations. The fact is that the measures of efficiency, Heat Rate and System Losses, serve as significant sanctions for inefficiency. Heat Rate measures the efficiency with which oil is used in the generation process