Callum
Callum

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I must thank Winsome Callum of the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) for her response (‘Don’t mislead the public, Mr Montague’,Gleaner, April 9, 2013) to my calls for her company to share in the sacrifices the whole nation is being called to undertake. The call was made on March 6, 2013 for her company to reduce electricity rates by 10-12 percentage points.

Two recommendations were then made.

1) For JPS to use the recommended Office of Utilities Regulation rates, as contained in the current request for proposal (RFP), for alternative energy solutions. JPS is suggesting a rate of US$0.2672 per kilowatt-hour. If you add the US$0.11 per kilowatt-hour, for transmission and distribution, you would get US$0.3772 per kilowatt-hour. JPS charges approximately, US$0.40 per kilowatt-hour.

A decrease in its rates to match the OUR rates would be welcomed by all JPS customers.

2) The Government was also asked to reduce the so-called guaranteed 17.5 per cent profits. The writer claims there are no such guaranteed profits.

Therefore, could JPS consider publishing the terms and conditions of the licence?

Would the JPS also consider engaging the OUR and see how best it could bring the rates in harmony? Noting that alternative energy solutions are more expensive?

I am well aware that JPS is one of our best corporate and compassionate citizens and will take into account the feeling of merciless exploitation, that many of its customers feel when we get our monthly bills.

I am also heartened by the openness of the company for dialogue and anxiously await an invitation so to do.

In the meantime, all of Jamaica would be so happy if the JPS announce a cut in its rates.

JPS, we are depending on you to help in whatever way you can to advance Jamaica.

ROBERT MONTAGUE

Chairman, JLP

Read more:

Callum
Callum

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I must thank Winsome Callum of the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) for her response (‘Don’t mislead the public, Mr Montague’,Gleaner, April 9, 2013) to my calls for her company to share in the sacrifices the whole nation is being called to undertake. The call was made on March 6, 2013 for her company to reduce electricity rates by 10-12 percentage points.

Two recommendations were then made.

1) For JPS to use the recommended Office of Utilities Regulation rates, as contained in the current request for proposal (RFP), for alternative energy solutions. JPS is suggesting a rate of US$0.2672 per kilowatt-hour. If you add the US$0.11 per kilowatt-hour, for transmission and distribution, you would get US$0.3772 per kilowatt-hour. JPS charges approximately, US$0.40 per kilowatt-hour.

A decrease in its rates to match the OUR rates would be welcomed by all JPS customers.

2) The Government was also asked to reduce the so-called guaranteed 17.5 per cent profits. The writer claims there are no such guaranteed profits.

Therefore, could JPS consider publishing the terms and conditions of the licence?

Would the JPS also consider engaging the OUR and see how best it could bring the rates in harmony? Noting that alternative energy solutions are more expensive?

I am well aware that JPS is one of our best corporate and compassionate citizens and will take into account the feeling of merciless exploitation, that many of its customers feel when we get our monthly bills.

I am also heartened by the openness of the company for dialogue and anxiously await an invitation so to do.

In the meantime, all of Jamaica would be so happy if the JPS announce a cut in its rates.

JPS, we are depending on you to help in whatever way you can to advance Jamaica.

ROBERT MONTAGUE

Chairman, JLP

Read more:

THE Jamaica Public Service (JPS) says customers will see a 10 per cent hike in their electricity bills this month, largely due to higher fuel costs and the depreciation of the Jamaica dollar.

“The high cost of the fuel bought from Petrojam to produce electricity, along with the continued devaluation of the Jamaican dollar, have resulted in an increase of approximately 10 per cent on customers’ March bills, relative to the bills they received in February,” the light and power company said in a release last night.

The Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica (PCJ) says it will be spending $5.6 million to upgrade the lighting facilities in three public-sector entities as part of efforts to drastically reduce their energy bills.

The upgrading work will be carried out on the May Pen and Spanish Town hospitals, as well as the Jamaica Police Convalescent Centre (JPCC).

According to the PCJ, this is projected to result in energy savings of 29,780 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, which translates into cost savings of more than J$950,000 annually.

Under the programme, the maternity ward at the Spanish Town Hospital will be retrofitted with fixtures “and other equipment” to reduce the use of electricity in the facility.

“The upgrade will cover restrooms, storerooms and general patient areas, most of which will be equipped with sensors to regulate lighting based on occupancy. The PCJ anticipates that the improvements will cut the hospital’s energy usage by 36,000 kWh per year,” said Dr Peter Ruddock, manager of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficient at the PCJ.

Similarly, the PCJ will be installing a solar photovoltaic system, rehabilitating old lighting poles and replacing existing halogen lighting with LED (light-emitting diode) lamps.

In addition, the JPCC is set to reduce its energy usage by 17,000 kWh per year as a result of the lighting-efficiency improvements recently undertaken at that institution.

The PCJ said during the last fiscal year, it invested more than J$53 million on public-sector energy-efficiency projects which are projected to result in more than $19.7 million in savings annually.

Read more:

THE Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica (PCJ) has undertaken a $5.6-million upgrade of the lighting facilities at the May Pen and Spanish Town hospitals and the Jamaica Police Convalescent Centre, in its bid to help reduce the public sector‘s energy bill.

The three institutions are the latest to benefit from a PCJ programme that facilitates the increased use of energy-efficiency technology by public sector entities.

Deputy director general of the OUR, Hopeton Heron (right), responds to a question at the 115MW project meeting hosted by the Office of Utilities Regulation, on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston. OUR's manager of utility monitoring and generation procurement, Peter Johnson, is at left.
Deputy director general of the OUR, Hopeton Heron (right), responds to a question at the 115MW project meeting hosted by the Office of Utilities Regulation, on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston. OUR’s manager of utility monitoring and generation procurement, Peter Johnson, is at left.

Steven Jackson, Business Reporter

 

This article was originally published online on Friday, January 18, 2013.

 

Prospective investors complained about parking millions of US dollars as a security deposit via the government regulator Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) for bidding on 115 megawatts (MW) of clean energy projects.

They also want safeguards against monopoly distributor Jamaica Public Service Company effectively underbidding them in applying for these projects – as it already controls the grid.

JPS is one of 85 entities which submitted expressions of interest for the 115-megawatt renewable projects. Proposals must be submitted by April.

The OUR noted the financial concerns while indicating that investors can use it as a JPS intermediary.

Over 200 prospective investors – one-quarter foreigners – attended an OUR meeting at The Knutsford Court Hotel in Kingston Thursday. The turnout “pleasantly surprised” OUR representatives.

It indicated the financial interest in renewable energy that forms part of the Government’s 2030 vision to reduce the island’s costly dependence on fossil fuels.

But one participant, general manager Wigton Wind Farm, Earl Barrett, complained of an additional financial burden requiring developers to put up at least 20 per cent of the financing of the project, which obviates full financing by banks.

Responding to the concerns, Peter Johnson, OUR manager of utility monitoring and generating procurement, said: “We want some commitment from the developers themselves. We do not want them to be just a conduit. That is the idea. We want some commitment from the developer.”

“It is not unreasonable,” added Courtney Francis, senior regulator of engineering at the OUR.

Leo Williams, seeking to represent bidders, said inter-connection with JPS would pose another hurdle in seeking financing for projects.

JPS can charge a higher fee to rivals to connect to the grid and a lower charge to itself, said Williams and other participants.

“The question of JPS and the level playing is one of which I hope you have heard. The concern expressed relates to the inter-connection costs to the (bidders) which are totally uncapped from the JPS side. So JPS could indicate all types of requirements which could drive the inter-connection costs up for the (bidder),” said Williams, who then asked in vain for the regulator to provide some indicative empirical costings.

“That would be rather difficult. We cannot give a per-unit cost because it depends on the technology, configuration, depends on where you are accessing the system from, the size, and a whole raft of things. It’s hard to quantify such costs,” Francis responded.

Industry players negotiate interconnection based on a minimum rate set by the OUR.

Renowned lawyer Frank Phipps queried the fairness of the inter-connection arrangement and whether in previous bids, rivals won over JPS bids.

“There have been previous applications where the JPS won and others in which others have won,” stated Johnson, who later added: “Please be reminded that there are already other independent power providers on the system and interconnection was a part of those arrangements. We have not seen or heard of concerns by those persons. So we are not aware of a foundation for these concerns at this time,” said Johnson.

Finally, Johnson sought to allay fears: “If you have difficulty dealing with the operator (JPS), we recommend that you submit queries to us.”

Two Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica representatives asked why not allocate a maximum slot for JPS to bid and offer the remainder to other players.

“We do not want suboptimal solutions. So we do not want to set aside anything without knowing it will generate least cost,” said Francis. “JPS has equal opportunity to bid and to participate as any other bidder.”

Bidders must submit a refundable security deposit equivalent to one per cent of the total proposed cost. They must also submit a non-refundable fee of US$8,000.

The security deposit can be sent to the OUR in the form of a cheque or a letter of credit. It can be held for up to a year, reasoned participants. Additionally, the OUR told the

Prospective investors flooded the 115MW project meeting hosted by the Office of Utilities Regulation, on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston.-CONTRIBUTED
Prospective investors flooded the 115MW project meeting hosted by the Office of Utilities Regulation, on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston.-CONTRIBUTED

Steven Jackson, Business Reporter

 

This article was originally published online on Friday, January 18, 2013.

 

Prospective investors complained about parking millions of US dollars as a security deposit via the government regulator Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) for bidding on 115 megawatts (MW) of clean energy projects.

They also want safeguards against monopoly distributor Jamaica Public Service Company effectively underbidding them in applying for these projects – as it already controls the grid.

JPS is one of 85 entities which submitted expressions of interest for the 115-megawatt renewable projects. Proposals must be submitted by April.

The OUR noted the financial concerns while indicating that investors can use it as a JPS intermediary.

Over 200 prospective investors – one-quarter foreigners – attended an OUR meeting at The Knutsford Court Hotel in Kingston Thursday. The turnout “pleasantly surprised” OUR representatives.

It indicated the financial interest in renewable energy that forms part of the Government’s 2030 vision to reduce the island’s costly dependence on fossil fuels.

But one participant, general manager Wigton Wind Farm, Earl Barrett, complained of an additional financial burden requiring developers to put up at least 20 per cent of the financing of the project, which obviates full financing by banks.

Responding to the concerns, Peter Johnson, OUR manager of utility monitoring and generating procurement, said: “We want some commitment from the developers themselves. We do not want them to be just a conduit. That is the idea. We want some commitment from the developer.”

“It is not unreasonable,” added Courtney Francis, senior regulator of engineering at the OUR.

Leo Williams, seeking to represent bidders, said inter-connection with JPS would pose another hurdle in seeking financing for projects.

JPS can charge a higher fee to rivals to connect to the grid and a lower charge to itself, said Williams and other participants.

“The question of JPS and the level playing is one of which I hope you have heard. The concern expressed relates to the inter-connection costs to the (bidders) which are totally uncapped from the JPS side. So JPS could indicate all types of requirements which could drive the inter-connection costs up for the (bidder),” said Williams, who then asked in vain for the regulator to provide some indicative empirical costings.

“That would be rather difficult. We cannot give a per-unit cost because it depends on the technology, configuration, depends on where you are accessing the system from, the size, and a whole raft of things. It’s hard to quantify such costs,” Francis responded.

Industry players negotiate interconnection based on a minimum rate set by the OUR.

Renowned lawyer Frank Phipps queried the fairness of the inter-connection arrangement and whether in previous bids, rivals won over JPS bids.

“There have been previous applications where the JPS won and others in which others have won,” stated Johnson, who later added: “Please be reminded that there are already other independent power providers on the system and interconnection was a part of those arrangements. We have not seen or heard of concerns by those persons. So we are not aware of a foundation for these concerns at this time,” said Johnson.

Finally, Johnson sought to allay fears: “If you have difficulty dealing with the operator (JPS), we recommend that you submit queries to us.”

Two Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica representatives asked why not allocate a maximum slot for JPS to bid and offer the remainder to other players.

“We do not want suboptimal solutions. So we do not want to set aside anything without knowing it will generate least cost,” said Francis. “JPS has equal opportunity to bid and to participate as any other bidder.”

Bidders must submit a refundable security deposit equivalent to one per cent of the total proposed cost. They must also submit a non-refundable fee of US$8,000.

The security deposit can be sent to the OUR in the form of a cheque or a letter of credit. It can be held for up to a year, reasoned participants. Additionally, the OUR told the

Prospective investors flooded the 115MW project meeting hosted by the Office of Utilities Regulation, on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston.-CONTRIBUTED
Prospective investors flooded the 115MW project meeting hosted by the Office of Utilities Regulation, on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston.-CONTRIBUTED

Steven Jackson, Business Reporter

 

This article was originally published online on Friday, January 18, 2013.

 

Prospective investors complained about parking millions of US dollars as a security deposit via the government regulator Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) for bidding on 115 megawatts (MW) of clean energy projects.

They also want safeguards against monopoly distributor Jamaica Public Service Company effectively underbidding them in applying for these projects – as it already controls the grid.

JPS is one of 85 entities which submitted expressions of interest for the 115-megawatt renewable projects. Proposals must be submitted by April.

The OUR noted the financial concerns while indicating that investors can use it as a JPS intermediary.

Over 200 prospective investors – one-quarter foreigners – attended an OUR meeting at The Knutsford Court Hotel in Kingston Thursday. The turnout “pleasantly surprised” OUR representatives.

It indicated the financial interest in renewable energy that forms part of the Government’s 2030 vision to reduce the island’s costly dependence on fossil fuels.

But one participant, general manager Wigton Wind Farm, Earl Barrett, complained of an additional financial burden requiring developers to put up at least 20 per cent of the financing of the project, which obviates full financing by banks.

Responding to the concerns, Peter Johnson, OUR manager of utility monitoring and generating procurement, said: “We want some commitment from the developers themselves. We do not want them to be just a conduit. That is the idea. We want some commitment from the developer.”

“It is not unreasonable,” added Courtney Francis, senior regulator of engineering at the OUR.

Leo Williams, seeking to represent bidders, said inter-connection with JPS would pose another hurdle in seeking financing for projects.

JPS can charge a higher fee to rivals to connect to the grid and a lower charge to itself, said Williams and other participants.

“The question of JPS and the level playing is one of which I hope you have heard. The concern expressed relates to the inter-connection costs to the (bidders) which are totally uncapped from the JPS side. So JPS could indicate all types of requirements which could drive the inter-connection costs up for the (bidder),” said Williams, who then asked in vain for the regulator to provide some indicative empirical costings.

“That would be rather difficult. We cannot give a per-unit cost because it depends on the technology, configuration, depends on where you are accessing the system from, the size, and a whole raft of things. It’s hard to quantify such costs,” Francis responded.

Industry players negotiate interconnection based on a minimum rate set by the OUR.

Renowned lawyer Frank Phipps queried the fairness of the inter-connection arrangement and whether in previous bids, rivals won over JPS bids.

“There have been previous applications where the JPS won and others in which others have won,” stated Johnson, who later added: “Please be reminded that there are already other independent power providers on the system and interconnection was a part of those arrangements. We have not seen or heard of concerns by those persons. So we are not aware of a foundation for these concerns at this time,” said Johnson.

Finally, Johnson sought to allay fears: “If you have difficulty dealing with the operator (JPS), we recommend that you submit queries to us.”

Two Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica representatives asked why not allocate a maximum slot for JPS to bid and offer the remainder to other players.

“We do not want suboptimal solutions. So we do not want to set aside anything without knowing it will generate least cost,” said Francis. “JPS has equal opportunity to bid and to participate as any other bidder.”

Bidders must submit a refundable security deposit equivalent to one per cent of the total proposed cost. They must also submit a non-refundable fee of US$8,000.

The security deposit can be sent to the OUR in the form of a cheque or a letter of credit. It can be held for up to a year, reasoned participants. Additionally, the OUR told the

THE 360-megawatt (MW) electricity generation plant to be located in Old Harbour, St Catherine, is now expected to come on stream in early 2016.

What’s more, commercial scale renewable energy projects won’t get the go-ahead until preferred bidders are selected from an ongoing request for proposal, which is scheduled to end in April.

The commissioning of the 66-MW West Kingston Power Plant last year would have led to more efficient generation, allowing for a reduction in the overall fuel bill of Jamaica.

Bringing it closer to the home or business also doesn’t appear to make solar-powered generating systems, or photovoltaic systems, any more feasible, given the sluggish process involved in getting them into net billing contracts.

And while electricity rates are at historical highs in Jamaica and it appears that Jamaica Public Service Company’s (JPS’s) customers won’t see a dramatic reduction in rates for years to come, some businesses still stand to benefit from power wheeling as early as this year.

Wheeling would give private entities access to JPS’s distribution lines to provide its own electricity at several sites across the island.

The OUR is now conducting a public consultation on a wheeling framework that would determine how self-generators would be charged for use of the national grid and aims to publish a determination notice on February 15.

Even then, wheeling has been a long time coming for some companies.

“The Jamaica Broilers (JB) Group has, over the years, invested considerable sums in its co-generation power plant with the hope that 2012 would have been the year that “power wheeling” became a reality in Jamaica,” said the company’s assistant vice-president of energy, John Carberry. “After a firm commitment by the nation’s leaders that this would be in place for 2012, the group was disappointed by several postponements and revisions of previously communicated launch dates.”

The uncertainty constrained the group’s further planned investments, but now JB hopes the framework and logistics will be unveiled early in 2013.

The commissioning of Jamaica Energy Partners’s (JEP’s) 66-MW West Kingston Power Plant last year meant more efficient generation, allowing for a reduction in the overall fuel bill of Jamaica, according to JEP’s managing director, Wayne McKenzie.

“This would have resulted in a lower heat rate system-wide,” he said.

The OUR also raised efficiency requirements, through the lowering of the heat rate target, that should have resulted in a 2.6 per cent reduction in fuel charges, which coupled with a 1.1 per cent increase in non-fuel tariff allowed to JPS, should have led to an overall reduction in electricity rates.

Nevertheless, JPS fuel rates ended last year 13 per cent higher than at the start, albeit slightly lower than the peak of $24 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) in May, and was on average six per cent higher than the average in 2011.

JB said it took a leadership position in the use of renewable energy in its poultry operations last year. It embarked on a solar photovoltaic (PV) energy programme “that sees its contract farmer network making the single largest investment in renewable solar energy in the Jamaican manufacturing sector”, according to Carberry.

“This programme continues to roll out through 2013 and is expected to be completed by the second quarter of 2013,” he said.

But participating farmers have expressed grave concerns as their efforts to expedite the standard offer contract (SOC) with JPS has been challenged by “the slow pace of the required administrative support to facilitate the necessary Grid -tied connections and metering”, according to the JB

vice-president.

“It is hoped that 2013 will see this process being streamlined as it threatens to derail the progress made thus far,” he told the Jamaica Observer.

The OUR said that in order

to facilitate a smooth implementation process, a sub-committee including members from the Bureau of Standards, MSTEM and JPS has been established by the National Energy Council to deliberate and resolve issues related to its implementation.

Twenty-six licences have been issued since the project was implemented at the end of May.

On a larger scale, investors wanting to build out renewable energy capacity in the latest round of investments in Jamaica will have to do so by early 2015.

Up to 115 megawatts (MW) are up for grabs.

The regulator is pushing for renewable generation plants to be up and running by May 2015.

Currently, approximately 64 MW of the 930 MW installed generating capacity in Jamaica is made up of wind and hydroelectric generators.

Another 6.4 MW hydro plant in Magotty, St Elizabeth, is set to come on line next year. Adding another 115 MW to that amount would substantially increase the proportion of electricity generated by renewables.

However, JPS’s owners are bringing 360 MW of capacity to be fired by natural gas on stream by 2015, to replace older and less efficient plants, which are rated at 292 MW, and add 68 MW to the grid.

The new liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants are now expected to come on line by the first quarter of 2016, instead of mid 2014 as originally required, or 2015 as was projected up to late last year.

The delay in implementing the largest single power generation project in Jamaica was due to uncertainties in the delivery date and price for procurement of natural gas through the GOJ Steering Committee led LNG Project.

However, last year the Government dropped the LNG Project, opting instead to leave the procurement to the private sector, or more specifically the owners of the new power plant.

“2013 may be a watershed year for generation in Jamaica,” said McKenzie. “The status of the natural gas project decides how pricing of energy and development will be done going forward. One must be mindful that a true fuel mix is required for generation and not just a majority switch from heavy fuel oil to natural gas.”

Read more: