Chris Bicknell, CEO of Tank-Weld Group.
A second effort at firing up the natural gas project seemed headed to derailment at midweek, but the candidate that would benefit from the collapse is keeping silent on its own readiness to step in.
A licence was issued to Energy World International to build a 381 MW LNG-fired plant on April 14, but the company has failed to secure backing for the project from the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), which indicated that it viewed the procurement process that selected EWI as flawed.
EWI missed the payment window for its performance bond of US$36.85m, which was due to the Office of Utilities Regulation on April 24, but said it had made the payment on Wednesday. The company previously paid US$7.37m as a bid bond on its US$737m project. It still needs to tie down financing for the full project.
The next candidate in line to do a deal with the OUR is Energise Jamaica, a consortium led by Tank Weld Group and Musson Jamaica.
“Our Energise group has decided not to comment at this time. We want to see how the government is going to play this out. So we have decided to wait on the Government’s next move in this process.” said Tank Weld CEO Chris Bicknell on Wednesday.
HIGHER PRICE
Energise’s bid would deliver electricity to the grid at a more expensive price, US$0.1827. EWI’s project is predicated on pricing of US$0.1288. The first candidate, which failed to pay over its bond and lost out on the deal, Azurest-Cambridge, had proposed to deliver power at US$0.1390.
The OUR said last October that Energise proposes to run its plant initially on heavy fuel oil at a price of US$0.2154 for one to two years after which it expects to switch to natural gas.
Technically, Azurest’s second bid option, a heavy-fuel oil plant, also beat out Energise’s natural gas price, but it’s unclear whether the OUR is obliged to offer the American company another shot at a deal. A request for clarification was unanswered up to press time.
Energise is yet to disclose its expected sourcing of natural gas and how it will finance its project. Bicknell declined to answer those questions Wednesday as the EWI issue continued to play itself out.
Energise said previously that it has mobilised equity backers willing to put up capital in excess of US$60 million, and that its project would lead to 25 per cent savings on electricity costs.
Energy Minister Phillip Paulwell made it clear on Tuesday that he was willing to go to the mat for EWI and would seek to sway the IDB’s decision to a yes on financing for the Hong Kong-based but Australian-connected firm.
The licence issued to EWI on April 14 was amended to remove a stipulation that the Energy Minister could take over the project during the construction phase if work on the plant had stopped for more than two days, but it maintains aspects of the ‘step-in’ or takeover provisions after the plant has been commissioned. These provisions allow the minister to acquire the plant if it is idle for more than 180 days but Jamaica would have to compensate EWI 75 per cent of the estimated present value of the business, based on its current and future cash flows projected out for 15 years.
The initial compensation in the April 4 version of the licence was 50 per cent.
How the OUR first ranked the LNG bids:
Rank Bidder Bid Price Fuel Type
1 Azurest-Cambridge 13.90 US c/kWh Natural gas
2 EWI 14.56 US c/kWhNatural gas
3 Azurest-Cambridge 16.35 US c/kWh Heavy fuel oil
4 Energise 18.27 US c/kWh Natural gas
5 Optimal 18.30 US c/kWh Natural gas
6 Energise 21.54 US c/kWh Heavy fuel oil
EWI later revised its price down to 12.88 US cents/kWh.

