Many of you may know that time of the month when you get emotional, angered, stressed or even feel urged to cry.

That’s right. Your light bill is too high.

Entertainment systems can burn up to 11 kWh a month when not in use, and can run a light bill of $5,000 a year.

Electricity prices have been stable for the last eighteen months, but residential consumers have been paying on average of $31 and $40 for each kilowatt-hour (kWh), depending on how much is used in any given month.

The price paid for electricity is higher for those with greater appetites for energy. That’s because the energy rate for each kWh above the first 100 kWh is 2.3 times the rate for the first 100 kWh

Many of you may know that time of the month when you get emotional, angered, stressed or even feel urged to cry.

That’s right. Your light bill is too high.

Entertainment systems can burn up to 11 kWh a month when not in use, and can run a light bill of $5,000 a year.

Electricity prices have been stable for the last eighteen months, but residential consumers have been paying on average of $31 and $40 for each kilowatt-hour (kWh), depending on how much is used in any given month.

The price paid for electricity is higher for those with greater appetites for energy. That’s because the energy rate for each kWh above the first 100 kWh is 2.3 times the rate for the first 100 kWh

Barbara Gayle, Justice Coordinator

Supreme Court Judge Bryan Sykes has ruled that the monopoly power distribution license granted to the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) is not valid.

In his ruling handed down a short while ago, Justice Sykes said the minister does not have the power to grant a license on terms which prevent other applicants from having their applications being considered genuine.

The judge also said the minister does not have the power to grant a license upon terms that bar the possibility of any other person entering the market for the transmission of electricity.

As a result, the judge says the terms of the JPS license granting it exclusive right to transmit electricity is not valid.

However, the judge says the minister has the authority to grant a license to an operator to supply power to the entire island.

The group Citizens United for the Reduction of the cost of Electricity had
brought a class action challenging the monopoly license granted to the JPS.

radio@gleanerjm.com

Jamaica is hoping to establish a floating LNG barge like this one found on the website of the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, posted courtesy of www.lngoneworld.com.
Jamaica is hoping to establish a floating LNG barge like this one found on the website of the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, posted courtesy of www.lngoneworld.com.

A plunge in the price of natural gas has made it cheaper for utilities to produce electricity. But the savings aren’t translating to lower rates for customers. Instead, United States electricity prices are going up.

Electricity prices are forecast to rise slightly this summer. But any increase is noteworthy because natural gas, which is used to produce nearly a third of the country’s power, is 43 per cent cheaper than a year ago. A long-term downward trend in power prices could be starting to reverse, analysts say.

“It’s caused us to scratch our heads,” says Tyler Hodge, an analyst at the Energy Department who studies electricity prices.

The recent heat wave that gripped much of the country increased demand for power as families cranked up their air conditioners. And that may boost some June utility bills. But the nationwide rise in electricity prices is attributable to other factors, analysts say:

In many states, retail electricity rates are set by regulators every few years. As a result, lower power costs haven’t yet made their way to customers.

Utilities often lock in their costs for natural gas and other fuels years in advance. That helps protect customers when fuel prices spike, but it prevents customers from reaping the benefits of a price drop.

The cost of actually delivering electricity, which accounts for 40 per cent of a customer’s bill on average, has been rising fast. That has eaten up any potential savings from the production of electricity.

Utilities are building transmission lines, installing new equipment and fixing up power plants after what analysts say has been years of underinvestment.

This may reverse what has been a gradual decline in retail electricity prices. Adjusted for inflation, the average retail electricity price has been drifting mostly lower since 1984, when it was 16.7 cents per kilowatt-hour.

“The ratepayer is going to have to foot the bill,” says David Wright, vice-chairman of the South Carolina Public Service Commission and president of the National Association of Regulatory Commissioners.

PRICE INCREASE EXPECTED

The average US residential electricity price is expected to be 12.4 cents per kilowatt hour for the June-to-August period, up 2.4 per cent from the same time last year. For the full year, electricity prices are expected to rise two per cent.

In a typical summer month, that would mean an extra $3 on a residential bill, which includes the cost of generating the power and delivering it to a home, plus local taxes and fees.

Electricity pricing is complicated, and it differs from state to state. In states where power providers are allowed to compete, such as Texas, Pennsylvania and New York, customers can shop around for cheaper electricity, although delivery charges are still set by regulators.

Natural gas has plummeted in price because of a dramatic increase in US gas production over the past few years and a warm winter that allowed supplies to build up.

Even though coal accounts for 38 per cent of all power produced in the US, natural gas plays an outsized role in determining the price of electricity.

The price paid for electricity from the last power plant fired up to meet demand at any given moment is what sets the wholesale price for a given region. And since gas-fired power plants are usually the most expensive, they tend to be fired up last.

– AP

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20120712/business/business1.html

Dear Reader,

This column appears on the very day that the landmark case challenging the monopoly licence of the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) will be heard in our country’s Supreme Court.

The JPS headquarters in New Kingston.

The case is immensely important and has wide implications for Jamaican consumers in general, and the energy sector in particular. It is being described in some quarters as “the most important development since Christopher Columbus landed in Jamaica”.

Last September, three Jamaicans, with the backing of the consumer advocacy group, CURE (Citizens United to Reduce Electricity), filed a suit against the JPS contending that the light and power company has been operating under an illegal monopoly licence for decades in the island. The three are former senator, Dennis Meadows, children’s advocate, Betty Ann Blaine, and businessman, Cyrus Rousseau. The case being argued on behalf of the citizens of Jamaica is being led by Attorney-at-law Hugh Wildman.

The substantive claim being made is that the JPS monopoly licence contravenes Section 3 of the Electric Lighting Act which stipulates that no one entity should be entitled to the generation of electricity in Jamaica. The claim also challenges the legality of the Office of Utility Regulations’ decision under Section 4 of the OUR Act in recommending that a monopoly licence be granted to the JPS. The three defendants in the case are the Government of Jamaica, the OUR and the JPS.

It is CURE’s position that for almost 50 years since the nation gained Independence, the JPS has operated under an illegal monopoly licence arrangement in which the company has been the sole provider of electricity, and a situation CURE argues that has not been in the best interest of Jamaican consumers.

Today, at US 41 cents per kilowatt hour, Jamaica has one of the highest electricity rates in the world, and the oil imported to generate this electricity is the largest single expense on the country’s national budget, representing 41 per cent of the country’s import bill. The expense of imported oil and imported food items together accounts for approximately 54 per cent of the total foreign currency imports into Jamaica.

Then there is the impact of decades of high electricity bills on the social fabric of the country. The stories of woes and hardships have been ceaseless – those coming from the poor and working classes especially have been overwhelming. There have been unending calls to talk shows about high and irreconcilable bills, stories of overbilling and disconnections, and talk of Jamaicans having to choose between buying food and paying light bills. While theft of any kind cannot be morally or legally justified, the high rate of electricity theft has been symptomatic of the exorbitant cost of electricity and its impact on the poor and working classes of this country.

Over the years I have been personally involved in cases where the elderly have been badly affected. I recall an old lady with tears running down her face, begging me to help because her light had been disconnected and she was living in darkness. In one entire community, citizens gathered together showing me their light bills which seemed clearly at odds with their modest one and two-room houses. This happened after the controversial smart meters were installed.

While the poor and working classes have been buckling under the pressure of high electricity bills, the small business sector has been operating on the verge of collapse. Perhaps more than any other group, Jamaica’s small and medium-sized business owners have been severely affected by the high cost of electricity, and even larger entities, such as the bauxite and cement companies have now found themselves in an uncompetitive environment as a result of high energy prices.

Today’s historic court case is unprecedented in Jamaican history. CURE believes that: “This move to have JPS’ illegal monopoly licence renegotiated is the inescapable foundation for building a new, competitive energy industry in Jamaica which will employ thousands, and above all, help to reduce the cost of electricity which everybody concedes is the single, greatest deterrent to economic growth and prosperity.”

Says CURE, “We are indeed thankful for what we have been able to accomplish with the support of citizens. This we feel is the beginning of a new approach to people power. We want to remind the JPS that while they are the “power” company, it is the people of Jamaica who hold the real power. It is now time for us to boldly challenge all the inequities in the society, and this case is a significant step in this regard.

“It is interesting to note that where monopoly licences are challenged and modified, that real competition begins to take place. Take a look at the current telecommunications industry and one sees how beneficial the competition is for consumers. We are calling on the government to take full advantage of this new development as they have done in the telecoms market, guaranteeing that the cost of electricity will go down, and that a fair and competitive system be put in place to benefit Jamaica.

“This case is also welcomed amidst the celebration of Jamaica’s 50th anniversary as an independent nation. We believe that this is a significant milestone in the country’s development and we look forward to a positive judgment,” asserts CURE.

I believe that every Jamaican would say, “Amen.”

bab2609@yahoo.com

Read more:

 

Workmen atop a Jamaica Public Service Company pole. Jamaica must revamp its energy framework if the country is to compete gainfully with rival nations which benefit from cheaper fuel sources.- File

 

Energy is set to wreck the weak CARICOM. Energy is a ball and chain hobbling the Jamaican economy. Energy, if it is true that human action is the principal cause of global warming and climate change from global warming, is set to wreak havoc upon the entire planet.

Omar Azan, a former president of the Jamaica Manufacturers’ Association, in a blistering speech last week, said government-subsidised electricity cost in Trinidad & Tobago was giving an unfair advantage to that country’s manufacturers in CARICOM trade. At US$0.05 per kilowatt-hour, the cost of electricity in T&T is some six times lower than the cost of electricity in Jamaica. Azan has threatened to lock down the country over the issue. Others have been openly advocating that Jamaica should withdraw from CARICOM.

Meanwhile, a powerful coalition of private-sector companies has been shouting, through expensive advertisements, that the cost of electricity has increased by 135 per cent since 2001 and advising us to “pull the plug on high light bills”. Exactly how to pull the plug has been left unspecified, like the Azan lockdown of the country.

Citizens United to Reduce Electricity (CURE) has gone the unprecedented route of taking action in the Supreme Court to test the legality of the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) all-island monopoly. CURE is asking the court to declare null and void the licence granted in 2001 by the energy minister and renewed in 2007.

The licence, according to the claimants, is in breach of Section 3 of the Electric Lighting Act of 1890. CURE attorney Hugh Wildman is arguing that under the act, and in particular Section 3, the island is broken up into areas over which the responsible minister may grant a licence to either the local authority or a private company to generate and transmit electricity.

“What is not permissible under Section 3, or any other section of the act, is an exclusive licence over the entire island. A licensee or undertaker is confined to the particular area over which a licence is granted,” Wildman submits to the court.

“The language of the legislation,” he points out, “throughout speaks in the plural, that is, undertakers and not undertaker. The legislation clearly expressed in no uncertain terms that there must be several undertakers generating and transmitting electricity throughout Jamaica. The concept of exclusivity is unknown to the legislation.”

And with respect to the Office of Utilities Regulation, Wildman said Section 4(3)(i) of the Office of Utilities Regulations Act