The Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) said it has caused J$21.15 million to be credited to the accounts of customers of the island’s two main utilities during the past year.

The money was credited to the accounts of customers of the National Water Commission (NWC) and the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) during the period June 2012 to May 2013, the OUR said in a statement yesterday.

The figure dwarfed the $1.19 million secured on behalf of customers during the June 2011 to May 2012 period. The OUR said the sums secured during the past year represents an increase of more than 1,600 per cent.

The OUR said the money was secured as a result of appeals done by the regulator on the behalf of customers. However, the nature of the main complaints against the companies was not obtained byWednesday Business

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I note with interest that the Consumer Advisory Committee on Utilities (CACU), an entity established and funded by the Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR), has come out in strong support of the Jamaica Public Service Company on maintaining its monopoly licence.

The CACU’s sudden advocacy for the retention of the monopoly would give one the impression that this is a group speaking on the behalf of Jamaican consumers. Nothing could be further from the truth. The CACU is simply a committee of the OUR set up to be the ‘consumer arm’ of the regulator.

You should recall that the CACU was merely set up by the OUR because of the absence of effective utility consumer advocacy.

While not accusing the CACU of anything unsavoury, you will understand my unease with the unit coming out in strong defence of the JPS, which, interestingly, partly funds the OUR, which, in turn, funds the CACU. There is an apparent incestuous and conflictual relationship.

It would be more palatable if the views were coming from the Consumer Affairs Commission (CAC), a creature of Parliament.

I call on the CAC to commission a research by experts on the feasibility of breaking the JPS monopoly and its implications on the cost of energy.

DENNIS MEADOWS (JP)

Opposition Senator

dennis.meadows@hotmail.com

Read more:

A vintage ampere meter.
Image via Wikipedia

The Jamaica Public Service (JPS) in its own inimitable way has sent yet another ‘shock wave’ to consumers when it announces that, among others, it will now be adding general consumption tax to reconnection charges. Never mind that the disconnection might have resulted in the first place from their actions – i.e., either the high cost to use their service or massive overbilling.

Electricity supply, like water, is a basic utility without which the quality of life for all individuals will be adversely affected. So, who will speak up against the action of the JPS?

Our first line of defence, the minister of mining and energy, is preoccupied with his personal well-being, and the next line of defence, the Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR), like many of us, are ‘shocked’ into silence. We dare not take to the streets as the residents of Seaview Gardens found out recently. So what are we to do? We need to examine carefully the role and functions of the OUR.

The OUR was established by an act of Parliament in 1995 to regulate the operations of utilities companies. According to the official website of the OUR, its role as an independent regulator is often misunderstood, particularly by its largest stakeholder group, consumers, who are of the general belief that it seems to side with the utilities providers.

The OUR’s mandate is not that of a consumer advocacy group and, as such, will only intervene in grievances if the affected utility consumer writes to them after getting no satisfaction from the utility company who, in their opinion, did them a disservice. If the overbilling by the JPS is not classified as grievances then what is? This overbilling for which many consumers are unable to pay will now have GCT added for the sure disconnection that will follow. All this while the OUR sits and do nothing when, in fact, it can. Even though it does not see itself as consumer advocacy group, it has a number of divisions, such as the Consumer and Public Affairs.

Advisory group

This division deals with consumer affairs, communication and information. It is in this division that the works of an independent advisory group is facilitated. The name of this group is Consumer Advisory Committee on Utilities. If the OUR wants to intervene on behalf of its consumers/stakeholders, then it can do so directly or indirectly, or however it thinks fit. Not to do so will only make consumers question their relevance in face of this frontal assault on our pockets by the JPS.

And I must admit that the JPS, over the years, has lost a lot of revenue through electricity theft, but we must not forget that a percentage of that ‘lost revenue’ was recovered from us legitimate customers on the approval of no less than the OUR, which now stands impotent.

I am, etc.,

HOWARD D. HAMILTON

Jamaica Gleaner