Shaw                                                                                                 File

Reacting to concerns that the raising of taxes on fuel has resulted in the spike in electricity bills consumers will face this month, Finance Minister Audley Shaw is arguing that the increase in special consumption tax (SCT) on heavy fuel oil (HFO) is only a nominal percentage of the rate increase the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) announced last week.

In response to questions from The Gleaner, the minister said that of the 12.8 per cent increase the JPS intends to apply, the increase in the SCT on HFO “translates to a mere 2.3 percentage points” or 18 per cent.

“As estimated in the tax measures, the effect of the increase in the overall SCT (specific and ad valorem) on HFO and LNG is approximately J$1.35 billion (or approximately US$11 million) in fuel costs to JPS. This would then approximate to a cost of US0.36 cents per kWh,” the minister said.

“Given the US two-cent-per kWh increase by JPS to consumers and the impact of the increased SCT of US0.36 cents per kwH to JPS costs, the percentage contribution of the tax to the pending JPS electricity bill increase would be 18 per cent. Therefore, the increase in SCT on HFO translates to a mere 2.3 percentage points of the 12.8 per cent electricity bill increase.”

Additionally, Shaw said he at no point stated that the increase would not affect the rates of the JPS as no one specifically asked him about the SCT on HFO.

“With reference to the comments by the minister of finance and the public service at the post-Budget press conference, it should be noted that the minister spoke to a question posed on the impact of the J$7.0 increase in SCT on fuel used for the purposes of ground transportation,” the statement read.

“The minister’s comments were not geared towards the impact of LNG or HFO on electricity prices. There were no questions posed about the effect of the increase in the overall SCT (specific and ad-valorem) of HFO.”

The increase in SCT on HFO that was announced during Shaw’s May 12 Budget presentation was one of three reasons Jamaica’s only power distribution company attributed to this month’s increase.

During his post-Budget press conference on May 13, Shaw, in responding to concerns that the new tax measures would affect light bills, said: “The argument also is that JPS light bills will go up as a result. And I want to remind everyone that this tax (on fuel) does not apply to Jamaica Public Service at all. It is only related to SCT for fuel for road transport only.”

anastasia.cunningham@gleanerjm.com

 

The Gleaner

 

JAMAICA Public Service (JPS) customers will be asked to pay more for their electricity this month — partly due to the recent increase in the Special Consumption tax (SCT) on heavy fuel oil (HFO), the light and power company advised yesterday.

The company said the spike is also due to an increase in the cost of the fuel used for electricity generation, caused by rising oil prices on the international market, and the continued devaluation of the Jamaican dollar.

“This is definitely not the best news for us at JPS, or for our customers,” JPS President and CEO Kelly Tomblin said in a release.

The Government last month introduced the $7 per litre increase as part of the revenue package to help finance its $580-billion 2015/16 Budget, but Finance Minister Audley Shaw, at the time, assured the panicking public that the tax would only apply to fuel at the pumps.

“This tax doesn’t apply to JPS at all. It is only related to SCT for fuel for road transport,” Shaw said at a post-budget press conference. The SCT is expected to yield $6.4 billion for the Government’s coffers.

In announcing the 12.8 per cent increase yesterday, the JPS urged consumers to “conserve on their electricity usage, as the upward trend in oil prices has resulted in an increase in the cost of electricity”.

“The overall increase will result in residential customers paying US$0.21 per kWh on average for electricity in June, compared to US$0.19 in May. This means that the average residential customer using 165kWh of electricity for the month, will see a $500 increase in his or her June bill, which will move from $3,875 in May to approximately $4,372 this month,” the JPS said.

The JPS president stressed that, despite the increase, electricity bills are still 20 per cent lower than they were in June 2015 when customers were paying US0.27 per kWh. The company argued that Jamaica continues to enjoy one of the lowest electricity rates in the region, behind Belize and Trinidad.

Reacting to the news, Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica (PSOJ) President William Mahfood reiterated that the sector had recognised from the outset that the imposition of the tax on the HFO and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) would have an incremental increase in the cost of electricity of five per cent.

“As far as the price of oil goes, this is a matter that is beyond our control (but) we still feel there should be some amount of hedge put in place to mitigate against future increases in the price of oil,” he remarked, noting that the sector is in full support of the phasing out of older power plants which rely on HFO and diesel.

He said that, while the phasing out of JPS’ 190-megawatt facility at Old Harbour will take a couple more years, eventually more plants will convert to LNG.

Mahfood said also that, like rising oil prices, the devaluation of the dollar against the US currency is out of Jamaica’s hands and can only be militated against by economic growth.

 

The Observer

Christie: Shaw failed to disclose many facts.
Christie: Shaw failed to disclose many facts.

Former Contractor General Greg Christie has accused Audley Shaw, opposition spokesman on finance, of a “disregard and total lack of respect for the rule of law” as well as an “unbridled” willingness to mislead the nation.

Christie was responding yester-day to comments made by Shaw and reported in

Tyrone Reid, Sunday Gleaner Reporter

A comprehensive operations audit of Jamaica’s state-owned oil refinery has questioned the legality and financial oversight of several mega contracts totalling hundreds of millions of US dollars per annum that are being entered into by Petrojam officials.

This is among a number of concerns contained in a “strictly confidential” report prepared by Centennial Group, a consulting firm from Washington, DC, which conducted a special operations audit of Petrojam Limited at the request of Finance Minister Audley Shaw.

The inspection was spawned by a massive $7.3 billion loss incurred by the company in the 2009 financial year.

The consultants, who stated that Petrojam could have substantially reduced its losses during a particular four-month period when the refinery was operating at high negative margins by increasing its reliance on imports to meet local demand, determined that several critical issues in the petroleum sector were too murky for comfort.

“High-value contracts for purchase of crude oil and petroleum products amounting to hundreds of millions of US dollars annually are being negotiated by a few Petrojam officials without any external oversight. Delegation of such responsibility needs to be established more carefully with proper oversight for better transparency,” the consultants said.

No authority to sign

The report also stated: “The legality of some contracts seems questionable with the system of delegation of financial authority being not clear. Amendments and/or renewals of some very high-value contracts have been done by some officers who may not have the required financial authority to sign these contracts.”

The consultants recommended that “a competent and authorised team of strong negotiators with skills in the oil trade with GOJ representation in the team should carry out these negotiations”.

“This will get the best possible terms for the country and would ensure adequate transparency in the deals. Further, in cases where petroleum products are imported without competitive bidding, as in the case of imports from Petrotrin, increased oversight is necessary by the Ministry of Energy and Mining, PCJ and Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA),” the report stated.

Commenting on the report, Winston Watson, general manager of Petrojam Limited, insisted that no unauthorised personnel signed a contract on behalf of the company. “I haven’t seen any document to substantiate that,” he told The Sunday Gleaner. In an earlier response issued by Petrojam on Friday, the company said it had an internal governance policy that was detailed in its chart of accounts with signing authority and delegation clearly identified.

“This chart of account has been approved by the board of directors and is strictly adhered to. At no point in the audit did the Centennial team request documentation on proof of signing authority; nor is Petrojam aware of any particular contract, the legality of which could be in any doubt by virtue of its signatory,” the Petrojam statement said.

The consultants also pointed out that the freight rates for product imports were unusually negotiated based on Petrojam’s own assessment. “This lacks transparency and evaluation of freight rates should be based on international benchmark rates published by Worlds Scale and AFRA ,” the consultants stated. AFRA, the average freight rate assessment, is one of the methods used to determine crude-oil freight rates.

In addition to those issues, the consultants highlighted that the demurrage – the charge for detention in port of a vessel by the ship owner beyond the time allowed or agreed upon – paid by Petrojam for vessels bringing in petroleum products appears to be excessive, running into millions of US dollars.

“Although Petrojam’s explana-tion is that high demurrage is the result of the limited capacity of the terminal, the dock occupancy was only 78 per cent in 2006, 83 per cent in 2008 and 80 per cent in 2009 up to July. In this context, it is worth mentioning that in some countries there have been many instances of collusion of port personnel with vessel owners for collecting extra demurrage,” the report stated.

Important issue

To further clean up the abysmal state of affairs in the country’s petroleum sector, Petrojam can no longer appear to be operating as a law unto itself, Centennial Group, the US-based audit consultants, has warned the Government.

“One important issue for the Government to resolve is that currently Petrojam is functioning virtually without effective oversight by either PCJ or the Ministry of Energy and Mining.

“There is need to develop this capacity with competent personnel who have knowledge of the petroleum sector. The Government also has to develop a satisfactory regulatory framework for the sector. At present, Petrojam serves as a quasi-regulator,” the consultants stated.

The consultants recommended that Petrojam, a joint-venture company with 49 per cent shares held by a foreign company – Petro Caribe S.A., an affiliate of

Tyrone Reid, Sunday Gleaner Reporter

A comprehensive operations audit of Jamaica’s state-owned oil refinery has questioned the legality and financial oversight of several mega contracts totalling hundreds of millions of US dollars per annum that are being entered into by Petrojam officials.

This is among a number of concerns contained in a “strictly confidential” report prepared by Centennial Group, a consulting firm from Washington, DC, which conducted a special operations audit of Petrojam Limited at the request of Finance Minister Audley Shaw.

The inspection was spawned by a massive $7.3 billion loss incurred by the company in the 2009 financial year.

The consultants, who stated that Petrojam could have substantially reduced its losses during a particular four-month period when the refinery was operating at high negative margins by increasing its reliance on imports to meet local demand, determined that several critical issues in the petroleum sector were too murky for comfort.

“High-value contracts for purchase of crude oil and petroleum products amounting to hundreds of millions of US dollars annually are being negotiated by a few Petrojam officials without any external oversight. Delegation of such responsibility needs to be established more carefully with proper oversight for better transparency,” the consultants said.

No authority to sign

The report also stated: “The legality of some contracts seems questionable with the system of delegation of financial authority being not clear. Amendments and/or renewals of some very high-value contracts have been done by some officers who may not have the required financial authority to sign these contracts.”

The consultants recommended that “a competent and authorised team of strong negotiators with skills in the oil trade with GOJ representation in the team should carry out these negotiations”.

“This will get the best possible terms for the country and would ensure adequate transparency in the deals. Further, in cases where petroleum products are imported without competitive bidding, as in the case of imports from Petrotrin, increased oversight is necessary by the Ministry of Energy and Mining, PCJ and Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA),” the report stated.

Commenting on the report, Winston Watson, general manager of Petrojam Limited, insisted that no unauthorised personnel signed a contract on behalf of the company. “I haven’t seen any document to substantiate that,” he told The Sunday Gleaner. In an earlier response issued by Petrojam on Friday, the company said it had an internal governance policy that was detailed in its chart of accounts with signing authority and delegation clearly identified.

“This chart of account has been approved by the board of directors and is strictly adhered to. At no point in the audit did the Centennial team request documentation on proof of signing authority; nor is Petrojam aware of any particular contract, the legality of which could be in any doubt by virtue of its signatory,” the Petrojam statement said.

The consultants also pointed out that the freight rates for product imports were unusually negotiated based on Petrojam’s own assessment. “This lacks transparency and evaluation of freight rates should be based on international benchmark rates published by Worlds Scale and AFRA ,” the consultants stated. AFRA, the average freight rate assessment, is one of the methods used to determine crude-oil freight rates.

In addition to those issues, the consultants highlighted that the demurrage – the charge for detention in port of a vessel by the ship owner beyond the time allowed or agreed upon – paid by Petrojam for vessels bringing in petroleum products appears to be excessive, running into millions of US dollars.

“Although Petrojam’s explana-tion is that high demurrage is the result of the limited capacity of the terminal, the dock occupancy was only 78 per cent in 2006, 83 per cent in 2008 and 80 per cent in 2009 up to July. In this context, it is worth mentioning that in some countries there have been many instances of collusion of port personnel with vessel owners for collecting extra demurrage,” the report stated.

Important issue

To further clean up the abysmal state of affairs in the country’s petroleum sector, Petrojam can no longer appear to be operating as a law unto itself, Centennial Group, the US-based audit consultants, has warned the Government.

“One important issue for the Government to resolve is that currently Petrojam is functioning virtually without effective oversight by either PCJ or the Ministry of Energy and Mining.

“There is need to develop this capacity with competent personnel who have knowledge of the petroleum sector. The Government also has to develop a satisfactory regulatory framework for the sector. At present, Petrojam serves as a quasi-regulator,” the consultants stated.

The consultants recommended that Petrojam, a joint-venture company with 49 per cent shares held by a foreign company – Petro Caribe S.A., an affiliate of

Paulwell

 

FORMER MINISTER of Finance Audley Shaw said on Wedsnesday that being absent from government has allowed him the opportunity to engage in deeper thinking.

Shaw made the comment while making his contribution to a debate on the third supplementary estimates in the House of Representatives.

“I am not going to be intimidated at the fact that only a few months ago I was a minister,” Shaw said as he suggested that the