THE Office of Utilities Regulations (OUR) is to partner with the National Contracts Commission to negotiate actively with four interested bidders for the building of a new power plant and present a recommendation to the Government in 30 days.

Minister of Science, Technology, Energy and Mining Phillip Paulwell, who made the announcement during his contribution to the 2013/14 Budget Debate at Gordon House in Kingston yesterday, said the OUR is to get additional powers of monitoring, evaluation and enforcement, similar to those it has over the telecommunications sector. “Legislation will be brought to Parliament during this year to amend the current Act,” he said.

Minister of Science, Technology, Energy, and Mining Phillip Paulwell makes his contribution to the 2013/14 Budget Debate at Gordon House in Kingston, Turn to POWER on Page 4 yesterday. (PHOTO: LIONEL ROOKWOOD)

In 2010, the OUR went to tender for 480 megawatts (MW) of generating capacity, and the Jamaica Public Service (JPS) was the sole bidder at the time and was awarded the right to construct a 360 MW combined cycle plant. It was contemplated that the Government

would be responsible for securing the supply LNG of fuel for the new plant, through the Liquefied Natural Gas project.

However, the OUR, on February 1 this year, informed the JPS and its shareholders that it had terminated the request for proposal (RFP) process in relation to the 360-MW project. The OUR said it ended the process after JPS missed a third deadline on January 30 to complete the requirements under the RFP for the 360-MW project and had requested a 30-day extension.

The JPS said the project scope changed significantly since 2011, when it was granted approval to proceed with construction of the plant saying its role initially was simply to construct the plant, but late last year the company was asked to take on the additional responsibility of identifying a supplier and managing the process of procuring the LNG.

A subsequent decision by the OUR to accept unsolicited proposals from the JPS and other companies, this year,

saw five entities presenting unsolicited proposals for 14 discrete projects.

Yesterday, Paulwell said this development was “a big turnaround from 2010, when there was a sole bidder, signifying confidence in this administration, its policies and regulatory framework”.

He said that following evaluations by international consultants Mott McDonald, which contemplated among other factors the firmness of the proposal, the overall price and expected impact on retail electricity rates of the 14 projects submitted, four were rejected because the information was incomplete.

The energy minister said, although 10 were screened for detailed technical and comparative economic analysis, of the 10, the OUR determined that three entities made the pitch. Those include Amorview/Tankweld, which presented a

232-MW project proposed for Old Harbour and a 122.4-MW project proposed for Caymanas; JPS, which presented proposals for a 323-MW and a 350-MW combined cycle plant, both proposed for Old Harbour; and Azurest/ Cambridge, which presented a proposal for a 388-MW plant mounted on a barge.

Paulwell said all three proposed the use of natural gas.

In the meantime, he said subsequent to the OUR receiving and assessing those proposals, the Government has since received another unsolicited proposal from a Hong Kong company, proposing to build an LNG receiving terminal and power plant and to supply LNG from its own gas fields. That company has proposed a combined cycle gas-fired 360-MW power plant adjacent to the LNG hub terminal.

“After several stops and starts, today I can speak with certainty that a positive change is about to come to the supply of electricity in Jamaica. It is essential that we begin construction of new generating capacity this year; there have been too many delays, and we can no longer live with these high electricity prices,” Paulwell told the House.

Read more:

 

 

 

altMinister of Science, Technology Energy and Minining, the Hon. Phillip Paulwell.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the motion in this 2013/2014 Budget Debate, truly a critical point for our country, our economy and the well being of our people.

 

Over the past 15 months, as we negotiated this new crucial IMF Extended Fund Agreement from the ru

CHIEF Executive Officer (CEO) of Jamaica’s PetroCaribe Development Fund (PDF) Dr Wesley Hughes has said that even a facile victory by

Callum
Callum

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I must thank Winsome Callum of the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) for her response (‘Don’t mislead the public, Mr Montague’,Gleaner, April 9, 2013) to my calls for her company to share in the sacrifices the whole nation is being called to undertake. The call was made on March 6, 2013 for her company to reduce electricity rates by 10-12 percentage points.

Two recommendations were then made.

1) For JPS to use the recommended Office of Utilities Regulation rates, as contained in the current request for proposal (RFP), for alternative energy solutions. JPS is suggesting a rate of US$0.2672 per kilowatt-hour. If you add the US$0.11 per kilowatt-hour, for transmission and distribution, you would get US$0.3772 per kilowatt-hour. JPS charges approximately, US$0.40 per kilowatt-hour.

A decrease in its rates to match the OUR rates would be welcomed by all JPS customers.

2) The Government was also asked to reduce the so-called guaranteed 17.5 per cent profits. The writer claims there are no such guaranteed profits.

Therefore, could JPS consider publishing the terms and conditions of the licence?

Would the JPS also consider engaging the OUR and see how best it could bring the rates in harmony? Noting that alternative energy solutions are more expensive?

I am well aware that JPS is one of our best corporate and compassionate citizens and will take into account the feeling of merciless exploitation, that many of its customers feel when we get our monthly bills.

I am also heartened by the openness of the company for dialogue and anxiously await an invitation so to do.

In the meantime, all of Jamaica would be so happy if the JPS announce a cut in its rates.

JPS, we are depending on you to help in whatever way you can to advance Jamaica.

ROBERT MONTAGUE

Chairman, JLP

Read more:

Callum
Callum

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I must thank Winsome Callum of the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) for her response (‘Don’t mislead the public, Mr Montague’,Gleaner, April 9, 2013) to my calls for her company to share in the sacrifices the whole nation is being called to undertake. The call was made on March 6, 2013 for her company to reduce electricity rates by 10-12 percentage points.

Two recommendations were then made.

1) For JPS to use the recommended Office of Utilities Regulation rates, as contained in the current request for proposal (RFP), for alternative energy solutions. JPS is suggesting a rate of US$0.2672 per kilowatt-hour. If you add the US$0.11 per kilowatt-hour, for transmission and distribution, you would get US$0.3772 per kilowatt-hour. JPS charges approximately, US$0.40 per kilowatt-hour.

A decrease in its rates to match the OUR rates would be welcomed by all JPS customers.

2) The Government was also asked to reduce the so-called guaranteed 17.5 per cent profits. The writer claims there are no such guaranteed profits.

Therefore, could JPS consider publishing the terms and conditions of the licence?

Would the JPS also consider engaging the OUR and see how best it could bring the rates in harmony? Noting that alternative energy solutions are more expensive?

I am well aware that JPS is one of our best corporate and compassionate citizens and will take into account the feeling of merciless exploitation, that many of its customers feel when we get our monthly bills.

I am also heartened by the openness of the company for dialogue and anxiously await an invitation so to do.

In the meantime, all of Jamaica would be so happy if the JPS announce a cut in its rates.

JPS, we are depending on you to help in whatever way you can to advance Jamaica.

ROBERT MONTAGUE

Chairman, JLP

Read more:

AZUREST Partners and Cambridge Project Development are saying that natural gas electricity generation can happen in Jamaica in little over a year.

The two firms’ joint submission to the Office of Utilities Regulations (OUR) proposes to use natural gas-fired power barges, which can be built within 12 to 15 months after getting the go-ahead from the Government.

An LNG offshore terminal designed for unloading, storage and regasifying liquefied natural gas. Azurest and Cambridge propose to build power barges that would be fed by small LNG ships.

What’s more, they believe that they can access liquefied natural gas (LNG) economically, “because we will have our own LNG source in the US Gulf Coast, the cheapest gas source in the world”.

The idea is to directly feed the power barges located in Jamaica from its fleet of smaller LNG supply vessels.

“Our smaller ships, of a scale appropriate to Jamaica, make our LNG transport process economical,” said Kenneth Allen, managing director of Azurest.

Allen said that his proposal allows for a modular approach to building out the generating capacity — each barge can provide 100 megawatts (MW) of capacity — but if allowed to build all of the 400 MW, its LNG-fired plants could save the country US$415 million annually.

“If we are allowed to put in all of our 400 MW of clean LNG high-efficiency generation capacity, then we should be able to reduce the price paid by the Jamaican public by at least 10 US cents (from 40 US cents to about 28 US cents), or about 25 per cent across the whole country,” he said.

Five entities have presented proposals to the OUR in response to its announcement in February that it would review proposals to supply generation capacity.

The OUR aims to advise the Government of the final results of its analysis on Monday.

Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) also submitted three proposals for consideration by the OUR, according to the power company’s CEO, Kelly Tomblin.

The proposals are for the construction of 360 MW of new generation capacity, using combined cycle technology and a combination of fuel sources: natural gas as primary fuel, with Automotive Diesel Oil (ADO) as backup fuel; natural gas as primary fuel with inlet air cooling power enhancement, and ADO as backup fuel; and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) as the primary fuel.

However, Wartsila Caribbean, which is the proposed technology provider for three of the bids, including the Cambridge/Azurest joint venture, has said that its reciprocating engines are a good deal more efficient than the combined cycle gas turbines (CCGT) being proposed for use by JPS.

The reciprocating engines could save over US$100 million a year more than the proposed CCGT, according to Wartsila Caribbean Vice-president Rodney George — and that’s even without LNG.

“Bogue is a living example where the CCGT plant has a combined cycle efficiency of only 40 per cent,” said George. “In comparison, the JEP (Jamaica Energy Partners) West Kingston plant with Wartsila reciprocating engines, have a simple cycle efficiency of close to 45 per cent… regardless of what fuel is utilised, be it LNG, LPG, or ADO, the efficiency quotient remains the same.”

Despite suggestions to the contrary, JPS is confident that combined cycle technology is of far greater benefit to the country than other options being considered, such as diesel engine technology, according to the JPS boss.

“While we haven’t seen the other proposals, our information shows that CCGT not only offers lower overall costs through greater efficiency and lower operating and maintenance costs. It is also more environmentally friendly,” Tomblin said. “Although JPS and the GOJ continue to evaluate all potential gas supply options, if the immediate supply options for LNG do not result in the desired reduction in electricity charges, LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) is a great option.

“LPG is more accessible right now and can be easily incorporated in our long-term plans for fuel diversification and price reduction,” she added. “The current prices show LPG providing attractive cost reductions for our customers.”

In the meantime, George proposes that the use of backup liquid fuel such as heavy fuel oil (HFO) is “not far-fetched given the uncertainty of securing LNG or LPG supplies”.

Allen said that if the other bidders aren’t using LNG, “they are probably not the lowest cost solution for the Jamaican electricity consumer”.

Cambridge is a developer of energy and environmental infrastructure projects focused on the Caribbean and has in-house experience successfully developing over US$2 billion in projects in the Caribbean Basin, as well as the long-term management of over 12 independent power plants.

Azurest Partners is a financial advisory and capital-raising firm, where team members have collectively raised over US$900 million in equity and US$2 billion in debt financing for clients in the US, UK and Africa.

Read more: