A JPS technician at work. - File
A JPS technician at work. – File

THE EDITOR, Sir:

WE ARE customers of the Jamaica Public Service Company. However, for over two weeks we have seen the service disconnected for up to 12 hours each day. The light is cut off from as early as 7:40 a.m. and does not return until minutes to eight in the nights.

We called after noticing this daily occurrence for a week and a half and were informed that the light is being disconnected because persons in the area are not paying their bills. When we asked for suggestions on coping with this situation, one customer service representative told us ‘to move’ while supervisor said ‘we should tell our neighbours to pay their bills’.

We reside in Windsor Heights, Central Village, St Catherine, and do not see why paying customers should be inconvenienced like this each day because JPS has failed to collect monies owing to them and want for us to do their compliance work. I think the customer service staff are rude and very inconsiderate.

We are now left with our food and medication that require refrigeration going bad and electrical appliances being damaged as a result of these daily outages. We are being seriously inconvenienced and JPS does not seem to care. They have not offered an end date to this and I am guessing that, based on the community in which we live, we will see this issue persist with no urgency to having the matter resolved.

suffering

I wish we could do as JPS customer service representative Antoinette suggested and move, possibly to Beverly Hills or Cherry Gardens, but, unfortunately, not all of us can reside in these areas.

I hope this letter will push JPS to realise that they do have customers here who need the service that they provide and that we have been paying for this service for years and we should not be made to continue suffering like this.

Lisa

Read more:

Paulwell
Paulwell

THE EDITOR, Sir:

 

I wish to congratulate Claude Clarke on his recent article headlined ‘Could Paulwell’s plan light the path to recovery?’

This is the best article written to date in connection with our cost of energy problem. I doubt if electricity rates can be reduced to 15 US cents per kilowatt-hour in the near future but do know that the current design engines working on heavy fuel oil (HFO), if installed, would be 35 per cent cheaper to generate electricity than what is currently being generated at Hunts Bay or Old Harbour Bay stations. Even if LNG is not immediately available it would be a start to the reduction of rates.

The modern day engines are dual fuel and can be shipped within 12 months. They can operate on HFO and be switched to LNG (without extra cost) whenever it comes.

The modern dual fuel engines operating on HFO carry a heat rate of under 8,000. The JPS plants at Hunts Bay and Old Harbour Bay go as high as 12,200. If energy fuel were liberalised two years ago we would now have been able to sell it at a lower cost to the consumer.

Welcome news

I believe that the statement made in Parliament recently by Phillip Paulwell is welcome news for the energy sector and he should be congratulated. Now that the announcement has been made, how do we proceed?

I do not believe that breaking the monopoly on transmission and distribution should be a priority but more effort should be put towards reducing the base load cost as quickly as possible.

D

Read more:

Professor Errol Morrison (left), president of UTECH, grabs the attention of Phillip Paulwell, minister of science, technology, energy and mining, while attending the launch of ACP/EU grant funded Solar-Hydrogen Research Project which was held at the Courtleigh Hotel in Kingston on Thursday, October 18. - Ian Allen/Photographer
Professor Errol Morrison (left), president of UTECH, grabs the attention of Phillip Paulwell, minister of science, technology, energy and mining, while attending the launch of ACP/EU grant funded Solar-Hydrogen Research Project which was held at the Courtleigh Hotel in Kingston on Thursday, October 18. – Ian Allen/Photographer

The University of Technology Jamaica (UTech) is leading an ambitious project that harnesses energy from water and sunlight to slash the US$30-million (J$2.7b) import bill for cooking gas.

It’s the largest project of its kind in Jamaica worth

A JPS technician at work. - File
A JPS technician at work. – File

Over 805,000 households in Jamaica or 91.3 per cent of the total captured in the 2011 census of population and housing, use electricity as a source of lighting.

The number is more than 200,000 bigger than the customer base of the country’s sole transmitter and distributor of electricity, the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS), which puts the number of clients on its books at under 600,000.

Responding to the findings, JPS Head of Corporate Communications Winsome Callum said the gap “probably an indicator of the number of households that are using electricity illegally”.

According to the census, a not insignificant number of the total 881,078 households captured under the study – 48,629 – use kerosene as their source of lighting. Other sources of lighting not specifically identified are used by 7,515 households, while 19,635 did not report a source.

As expected, St Andrew households are the largest consumers of electricity with 184,176 having access; followed by St Catherine where 151,865 households are powered, Clarendon with 68,286 households having access, St James with 56,403, and Manchester where power penetration is across 54,125 households.

Of the total number of households, 80 per cent or 705,235 use liquid petroleum gas (LPG) as a source of fuel for cooking; 15,803 or 1.8 per cent use electricity for that purpose; 8.9 per cent or 78,700 use wood; and 6.1 per cent or 53,876 use charcoal. Less than one per cent or just 94 households use biogas; and only 25 households use solar energy – suggesting that the use of renewables in Jamaica is still in the infancy stage.

The five largest concentrations of LPG users are found in St Andrew followed by St. Catherine, St James, Clarendon and Manchester.

According to the census conducted by the Statistical Institute of Jamaica (Statin), just 16 per cent of households or 141,835 have access to treated piped water for drinking. Another 68,839 households reported having access to treated drinking water, but it is not piped.

Statin found that 503,411 households or a significant 57.1 per cent have access to piped water used for drinking, but said it is not treated. Another 85,392 households or 9.7 per cent have access to water for drinking from other sources not specifically identified, but it is also not treated.

Statin has not identified a reason for the large number of households not having access to treated water for drinking.The census found that 7.5 per cent or 66,843 households now use bottled water for drinking.

However, the low level of treated piped water used for drinking is not necessarily reflective of the state-owned National Water Commission‘s (NWC) services according to Statin’s Director of Censuses, Demographics and Social Statistics Dr Valerie Nam.

Public relations officer at the NWC Karen Williams said the agency has a customer base of about 425,000, comprising residential and commercial consumers and that it treats all the water it supplies.

Consumption of the NWC’s supplies is reflected in the census document by separate breakdown of households’ source of water used for domestic purposes. It shows that 450,625 households or 51.1 per cent obtain the commodity from a public source and have it piped into their homes.

Another 140,678 or almost 16 per cent of households had water piped into their yard; 52,371 or about six per cent obtain it from standpipes and 10,776 or 1.2 per cent get it from catchments.

mcpherse.thompson@gleanerjm.com

Read more:

Customers of Jamaica‘s main electricity supplier, Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS) are to see higher prices for electricity for a second straight month.

JPS will hike electricity costs, by about 5.5 percent.

That increase comes as fuel charges rose to a five month high.

Last month, fuel and IPP charges rose by as much as 17 percent.

That increase was cited as the main reason behind inflation in September alone, being equivalent to that of the previous five mnths combined.

Read more:

Oil gave up early gains and hovered around $92 per barrel on Wednesday after the government reported a bigger-than-expected increase in United States crude supplies.

Supplies rose by 2.9 million barrels last week. That was almost double what analysts had forecast, according to Platts, the energy information arm of McGraw-Hill Cos.

Gasoline supplies also rose. Analysts had predicted a decline.

The extra gasoline and oil in storage tends to push prices down, because it suggests that there’s enough to go around, or that demand is low.

In afternoon trading on Wednesday, oil was down 7 cents to $92.02 per barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Oil had been trading above $92 per barrel earlier in morning, as European stocks had a positive day, and hopes grew that Spain might be on the verge of requesting a bailout.

The waffling oil prices matched stock indexes that are also mixed in midday trading. Technology giants IBM and Intel both said customers are holding back. Economic weakness generally means less demand for oil, pushing prices down.

Brent crude, which is used to price international varieties of oil, fell 80 cents to $113.20 a barrel on the ICE Futures exchange in London.

In other energy futures trading on the Nymex, heating oil fell 2 cents to $3.17 per gallon, natural gas gained 5 cents to $3.48 per 1,000 cubic feet and wholesale gasoline fell 6 cents to $2.79 per gallon.

– AP

Read more: