As you read this, Phillip Paulwell, Jamaica’s energy minister, is likely playing Mas in Trinidad at its annual carnival. Jamaicans may be minded to say that he is playing something else.

People here are also likely to conclude that the energy minister’s sojourn to Trinidad, and whatever he may be getting up to in Port-of-Spain, San Fernando, Arima, Diego Martin, or wherever, also says something about Mr Paulwell’s sense for priorities. That is a matter on which we would like to hear the view of Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller.

First, though, we must make clear that this newspaper does not begrudge Mr Paulwell, or anyone else, his right to annual holidays. Nor would we normally care should any Jamaican decide to jet off to Port-of-Spain to join a carnival band, swig rum and dance up a storm at the Savannah. Which, of course, is not a claim we make of Mr Paulwell, not withstanding our unease at his absence from Jamaica at this time.

Here is the context. Jamaica faces not merely a crisis, but an energy emergency. Our sense, though, is that no one in the Government, including the portfolio minister, seems to grasp either the depth or the immediacy of the problem – at least not sufficiently for it to impinge on the bacchanal.

In Trinidad and Tobago, where the music of ‘Despas’, Destra, Machel and others may be echoing in Mr Paulwell’s head, firms pay around US$0.05 per kilowatt-hour for electricity. The Trinidadians have oil and gas and enjoy government subsidies on their power bill.

In energy-deficient Jamaica, we pay upwards of US$0.41 per kilowatt-hour for electricity, which is a significant input in production and a high price which helps to make Jamaican firms uncompetitive. Indeed, over the past decade and a half, several plants that built things in Jamaica have migrated in favour of Trinidad, with which we run a trade deficit of nearly US$1 billion.

ENERGY WAFFLE

For more than a decade, Jamaican administrations have waffled and procrastinated over an energy policy to deliver cheaper electricity prices. Recently, under Mr Paulwell’s watch, there has been the final slow-motion collapse of a project that was to make liquefied natural gas (LNG) as the fuel of choice and to deliver electricity at between a 33 and 40 per cent below current prices.

Last week, for instance, the Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR) rescinded the Jamaica Public Service Company’s (JPS) position as the preferred bidder on a 360-megawatt, gas-fired power plant because the light and power company missed deadlines to demonstrate that it could meet the benchmark price. The problem is that JPS, having assumed the effort to source the fuel after the Government backed out, has been unable to find LNG cheap enough for the project to make sense at the target price.

Minister Paulwell claimed to have been blindsided by the OUR actions, suggesting that he was in favour of giving JPS additional time, without the continued financial burden of a performance bond, to rescue the deal. The upshot has been a state of confusion, in the Government and elsewhere, over energy. The situation is in need of a steady and steadying hand.

In the midst of this situation, Mr Paulwell chose carnival – the kind of stuff that would make Les Green‘s day.

The opinions on this page, except for the above, do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. To respond to a Gleaner editorial, email us: editor@gleanerjm.com or fax: 922-6223. Responses should be no longer than 400 words. Not all responses will be published.

Read more:

Jamaica Public Service Company headquarters on Knutsford Boulevard in New Kingston. - File
Jamaica Public Service Company headquarters on Knutsford Boulevard in New Kingston. – File

The Office of Utilities Regulation has formally cancelled its agreement with JPS for development the 360 MW liquid natural gas plant, but the power company said Tuesday that the decision does not mean an end to the energy project.

Jamaica Public Service Company presented a modified version of the development to the OUR last Thursday, but would not say whether that plan still banks primarily on LNG for the plant ahead of feedback from the regulator on its proposal.

Company spokeswoman Winsome Callum told

THE EDITOR, Sir:

IN RESPONSE to my letter published on Friday, January 25, and a response by Petrojam Limited on page A9 of your opinion page of Tuesday, January 29, I felt compelled to respond, as they mentioned my name and I found this article a bit disconcerting and arrogant in light of what is happening to this section of the consuming public.

How can a product be said to be ‘up to par’ when it does not meet or exceed international standards? Why is Petrojam considering importing ultra-low sulphur diesel, until their refinery is upgraded? Isn’t this an admission that the present diesel oil on the market is not ‘up to par’?

Countries and companies do not unilaterally set standards and have a minister with oversight for energy sign off on same and then say you have adhered to prescribed standards, nor does the ‘Government of Jamaica Petroleum Quality Control Act’ mean anything if they are not in keeping with international standards.

To take it to the ridiculous, Jamaica might just as well start researching the setting of Jamaica Standards for Nuclear Fusion as this may be the answer to mankind’s future energy solution.

For Petrojam to say that they have adhered to these standards and are in compliance with them is hogwash, when owners of diesel motor vehicles are suffering physical, emotional and financial stress because of this ‘up to par’ diesel oil.

uneconomical product

I am sure that, except for the bauxite companies, Petrojam has one of the largest contingents of chemical engineers on staff. These engineers should advise themselves that were the manufacturers of diesel engines to develop an engine to genuinely manage this high sulphur content, then the metal or alloy used would render the cost of that engine uneconomical, and what, then, of the emissions?

There are protocols and standards which are recognised internationally by conventions and otherwise, that countries, even Third World ones like Jamaica, should adhere to.

Jamaica does not manufacture diesel engines, so they cannot set standards for engines outside of the specifications of manufacturers who are adhering to international standards.

In the article, Petrojam mentioned being environmental stewards and refer to the blending of ethanol, thereby reducing emission of lead. While this is commendable, it was not their environmental consciousness that achieved this but, rather, it was as a consequence of the main aim of reducing the cost of input into petrol to ensure greater profitability.

HUGH SANDFORD (PE)

Satyn@cwjamaica.com

Read more:

Dear Editor,

While it is good that mining minister Philip Paulwell is pushing for Jamaica to start the process of developing its rare earth industry, I cannot help but wonder why is it that we seem forever stuck in this cycle of thinking inside the box.

PAULWELL … pushing for development of rare earth industry

Nothing is wrong with the attempt of the Government to extract rare earths from our red mud. Indeed, this effort of the government must be commended. However, if Jamaica is to truly develop, we have to start thinking outside of the box.

The primary focus of Minister Paulwell seems to be to get the project to a stage where we can export rare earths in commercial quantities. Again, nothing is wrong here. But why don’t we look at ways to develop our own industrial base with these rare earth minerals?

We are now hoping to export these minerals to Japan. What does Japan plan to do with these minerals? They plan to develop their own advanced electronic industries. Why can’t we also begin to think like this? Why must we always be willing to supply the minerals that others use to develop their own industries, while we suffer?

We did the same with bauxite, and now we are about to do the same with these rare earth minerals. When will we ever learn?

One of the reasons why there is such a global shortage of these rare earths is because China, the world’s largest exporter, is curtailing its exports. It is not just because they want to save what they have left for their own future generations

Jamaica Public Service Company will not bid on the 115 MW renewable energy project, says energy minister Phillip Paulwell in an advisory meant to allay fears that prospective investors would have to compete with the monopoly power distributor.

Additionally, the one per cent bond imposed on bidders will now be applied after the selection of qualified bids.

The adjustment followed complaints from the Jamaica Solar Energy Association that the upfront proposal costs were too high – ranging from just under US$1 million to as high as US$2 million, according association president Roger Chang.

The bid deadline has also been extended two months to June 2013.

More than 80 investors have already indicated interest in the project. They complained at a mid-January meeting with the OUR that, were JPS to participate in the project, the power utility, which controls the national grid, could easily under-bid them.

business@gleanerjm.com

Read more:

Jamaica Public Service Company headquarters on Knutsford Boulevard in New Kingston. - File
Jamaica Public Service Company headquarters on Knutsford Boulevard in New Kingston. – File

The Office of Utilities Regulation has formally cancelled its agreement with JPS for development the 360 MW liquid natural gas plant, but the power company said Tuesday that the decision does not mean an end to the energy project.

Jamaica Public Service Company presented a modified version of the development to the OUR last Thursday, but would not say whether that plan still banks primarily on LNG for the plant ahead of feedback from the regulator on its proposal.

Company spokeswoman Winsome Callum told

We are sick and tired of Mr Phillip Paulwell’s approach to energy policy formulation that appears to us to be an amalgam of stalking horses, three-card tricksters, and loquacious bravado.

So, it is time for the minister to end the drawing room charade and come clean with the Jamaican people. There is far too much at stake for anything less.

We here refer to what, at a glance, seems to be a public difference between the energy and mining minister and Mr Zia Mian, the outgoing head of the Office of Utilities Regulation (OUR), over whether the agreement for the Jamaica Public Service Company (JPS), the light and power provider, to build a 360-megawatt power plant will be, is, or has been rescinded.

Ask us: It’s all a contrivance. It has been an open secret for weeks, especially in circles where energy matters are discussed, that JPS’s successful bid for the plant would be abrogated and another route sought. The deed, the OUR has now reported, is done. Prior to that, the issue was how to announce a policy lurch on energy to the public and how breaking the contract would be achieved without inviting lawsuits from JPS.

ENERGY CRISIS

The background to this matter is – Minister Paulwell’s obfuscatory palliative notwithstanding – on Jamaica’s energy crisis. We described the energy situation as such because at more than US$0.41 per kilowatt-hour, the cost of electricity in Jamaica is not only high, but destabilising to the economy. It helps to make our firms uncompetitive in the global market.

Indeed, it was this problem that the new JPS plant, to be fired by natural gas, was aimed at curing. Gas is cheaper than the expensive oil that now accounts for more than 90 per cent of Jamaica’s energy.

At the time of the bidding, during the former administration, after more than a circumlocutory discourse on the energy question, the Government undertook to source liquefied natural gas (LNG) for the facility. The problem is that it could not find LNG at a price that allowed for a one-third drop in electricity prices.

The administration backed out of the undertaking to procure the fuel and gave the task to JPS. It was soon apparent that JPS was not having any better luck. In the meantime, Mr Paulwell was floating new, untried gas transportation/delivery technology to achieve this end. His effort seems to have failed.

FORK IN THE ROAD

All this seems to have played into Mr Paulwell’s preference of coal as Jamaica’s best, and most economic, fuel option. It was Mr Mian’s preferred option, too, nearly a decade and a half ago when he first advised Jamaica on energy. Later, in line with government policy, he worked on the LNG option, but says that Jamaica missed the window. Mr Mian now says that the OUR will retender the power plant, but this time with an open fuel option.

Mr Paulwell, in ‘responding’ to Mr Mian’s comments, says that while “we have been in discussions with the OUR”, there was as yet no formal submission to take to the Cabinet. He knows, too, that JPS has made “a revised submission” on the plant. What that entails, we were not told.

These statements were being made only hours before the OUR’s formal declaration that it had pulled the plugged on JPS.

So, after a zigzag run, the energy question slowed at another fork in the road. What we need is some damn honesty on the matter. We won’t tolerate hazy backroom dealing on this.

The opinions on this page, except for the above, do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. To respond to a Gleaner editorial, email us: editor@gleanerjm.com or fax: 922-6223. Responses should be no longer than 400 words. Not all responses will be published.

Read more: